CFG
Price
$51.72
Change
-$0.94 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.62B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$17.65
Change
-$0.11 (-0.62%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.21B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs FULT

Header iconCFG vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs FULTBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$51.72
Change-$0.94 (-1.79%)
Volume$26.18K
Capitalization22.62B
Fulton Financial
Price$17.65
Change-$0.11 (-0.62%)
Volume$18.28K
Capitalization3.21B
CFG vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. FULT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and FULT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $52.66 vs. FULT: $17.76)
Brand notoriety: CFG and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 88% vs. FULT: 100%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $22.62B vs. FULT: $3.21B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.62B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($22.6B) has a higher market cap than FULT($3.21B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than FULT: CFG (14.75) vs FULT (9.30). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 24.954 vs. FULT (-5.103). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. FULT (362M). FULT has less debt than CFG: FULT (1.77B) vs CFG (12.8B). CFG has higher revenues than FULT: CFG (8.06B) vs FULT (1.29B).
CFGFULTCFG / FULT
Capitalization22.6B3.21B704%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.954-5.103-489%
P/E Ratio14.759.30159%
Revenue8.06B1.29B625%
Total Cash8.55B362M2,361%
Total Debt12.8B1.77B722%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
107
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4039
SMR RATING
1..100
712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6781
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFG (76). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFG’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (40). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (12). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FULT (59). This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FULT’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (81). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTCLX352.060.25
+0.07%
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital App Adm
TSLIX5.39N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value I
NNTWX31.55-0.01
-0.03%
Nicholas II N
HBGIX22.80-0.01
-0.04%
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IB
LGCFX20.26-0.03
-0.15%
Lord Abbett Global Equity F

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.80%
KEY - CFG
94%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
WBS - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
TFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
WTFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.28%
FNB - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
HWC - FULT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
ZION - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
CFG - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
HOPE - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More