CFFN
Price
$6.43
Change
+$0.10 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
797.05M
16 days until earnings call
PGC
Price
$30.25
Change
-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
428.6M
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFN vs PGC

Header iconCFFN vs PGC Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs PGCBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$6.43
Change+$0.10 (+1.58%)
Volume$477.82K
Capitalization797.05M
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Price$30.25
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization428.6M
CFFN vs PGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. PGC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a Buy and PGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $6.43 vs. PGC: $30.38)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and PGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 48% vs. PGC: 47%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $797.05M vs. PGC: $428.6M
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $797.05M. PGC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $428.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PGC is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGC is a better buy in the short-term than CFFN.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.41% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

PGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFN($797M) has a higher market cap than PGC($429M). CFFN has higher P/E ratio than PGC: CFFN (10.40) vs PGC (8.96). CFFN YTD gains are higher at: 11.977 vs. PGC (-4.899). CFFN has more cash in the bank: 32.6M vs. PGC (7.4M). PGC has less debt than CFFN: PGC (553M) vs CFFN (2.37B). PGC has higher revenues than CFFN: PGC (226M) vs CFFN (-41.29M).
CFFNPGCCFFN / PGC
Capitalization797M429M186%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.977-4.899-244%
P/E Ratio10.408.96116%
Revenue-41.29M226M-18%
Total Cash32.6M7.4M441%
Total Debt2.37B553M429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs PGC: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
PGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
2526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFFN (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's SMR Rating (25) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PGC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PGC’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNPGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMEX15.420.14
+0.92%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq A
WPVIX35.370.26
+0.74%
Weitz Multi Cap Equity-Institutional Cl
NWGSX29.070.16
+0.55%
Nationwide WCM Focused Sm Cp Instl Svc
AEIUX8.770.02
+0.23%
American Century Equity Income R5
VLSCX16.53N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
+1.58%
UBSI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
PGC - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
OBK - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
BHB - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
NBTB - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
+2.36%
PFS - PGC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
HBNC - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
PEBO - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
TCBK - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
UBSI - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More