CFFI
Price
$70.23
Change
-$0.21 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 15, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
223.5M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMBH
Price
$41.54
Change
+$1.10 (+2.72%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
970.01M
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFI vs FMBH

Header iconCFFI vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts CFFI vs FMBHBanner chart's image
C&F Financial
Price$70.23
Change-$0.21 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization223.5M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$41.54
Change+$1.10 (+2.72%)
Volume$3.19K
Capitalization970.01M
CFFI vs FMBH Comparison Chart in %
CFFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFI vs. FMBH commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFI is a Hold and FMBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CFFI: $70.44 vs. FMBH: $40.44)
Brand notoriety: CFFI and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFI: 43% vs. FMBH: 132%
Market capitalization -- CFFI: $223.5M vs. FMBH: $970.01M
CFFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $223.5M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $970.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFFI is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than CFFI.

Price Growth

CFFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($970M) has a higher market cap than CFFI($224M). FMBH has higher P/E ratio than CFFI: FMBH (11.08) vs CFFI (8.54). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 3.692 vs. CFFI (-2.962). FMBH has more cash in the bank: 16.1M vs. CFFI (15.2M). CFFI has less debt than FMBH: CFFI (113M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than CFFI: FMBH (339M) vs CFFI (133M).
CFFIFMBHCFFI / FMBH
Capitalization224M970M23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.9623.692-80%
P/E Ratio8.5411.0877%
Revenue133M339M39%
Total Cash15.2M16.1M94%
Total Debt113M363M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFI vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
CFFI
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4265
SMR RATING
1..100
4224
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFI's Valuation (19) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that CFFI’s stock grew significantly faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (65). This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (42). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (59). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (85). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFIFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSNGY19.940.25
+1.27%
Hang Seng Bank Ltd.
MEIYF12.98N/A
N/A
Mercialys Paris
MSCH0.28N/A
N/A
MainStreetChamber Holdings Inc.
PSMMY36.32-0.75
-2.01%
Persimmon Plc
KIQSF0.14N/A
-2.01%
Kelso Technologies, Inc.

CFFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFI has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFFI jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFI
1D Price
Change %
CFFI100%
+2.28%
FUNC - CFFI
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
FBIZ - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
BUSE - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
PFS - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
FMBH - CFFI
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+2.72%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
BY - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
PEBO - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
BUSE - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
TRMK - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More