CFEIY
Price
$4.66
Change
-$0.51 (-9.86%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CIADF
Price
$1.88
Change
-$0.02 (-1.05%)
Updated
Dec 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFEIY vs CIADF

Header iconCFEIY vs CIADF Comparison
Open Charts CFEIY vs CIADFBanner chart's image
China Feihe
Price$4.66
Change-$0.51 (-9.86%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization4.52B
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$1.88
Change-$0.02 (-1.05%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.63B
CFEIY vs CIADF Comparison Chart in %
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFEIY vs. CIADF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFEIY is a Hold and CIADF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CFEIY: $4.66 vs. CIADF: $1.88)
Brand notoriety: CFEIY and CIADF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFEIY: 261% vs. CIADF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CFEIY: $4.52B vs. CIADF: $7.63B
CFEIY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.52B. CIADF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $246.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFEIY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFEIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIADF is a better buy in the long-term than CFEIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFEIY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIADF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFEIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CIADF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIADF is a better buy in the short-term than CFEIY.

Price Growth

CFEIY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -9.81% price change this week, while CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.75% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($7.63B) has a higher market cap than CFEIY($4.52B). CIADF has higher P/E ratio than CFEIY: CIADF (515.87) vs CFEIY (11.21). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CFEIY (-11.011).
CFEIYCIADFCFEIY / CIADF
Capitalization4.52B7.63B59%
EBITDA4.99BN/A-
Gain YTD-11.0110.000-
P/E Ratio11.21515.872%
Revenue19.8BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFEIY vs CIADF: Fundamental Ratings
CFEIY
CIADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFEIY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (38). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (56). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CFEIY (81). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CFEIY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFEIY (77). This means that CIADF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFEIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFEIYCIADF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDVWX8.320.02
+0.24%
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value W
EURCAD1.62N/A
N/A
Euro - Canadian Dollar
HKDEUR0.11N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Euro
USDEUR0.86N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Euro
HIEMX8.65-0.07
-0.80%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity I

CFEIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFEIY has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFEIY jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFEIY
1D Price
Change %
CFEIY100%
N/A
CHFLF - CFEIY
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNFSA - CFEIY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADF - CFEIY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGY - CFEIY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
ASBFY - CFEIY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
SHVTF - CIADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CIADF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CIADF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
DANOY - CIADF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
CIADY - CIADF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
More