It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFEIY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCFOO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFEIY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFOO’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
CFEIY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
CFEIY | CFOO | CFEIY / CFOO | |
Capitalization | 5.52B | 50.6M | 10,917% |
EBITDA | 7.19B | -365.58K | -1,967,006% |
Gain YTD | 8.725 | -13.779 | -63% |
P/E Ratio | 7.43 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 21.3B | 298K | 7,147,651% |
Total Cash | N/A | 309K | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 7.12K | - |
CFEIY | CFOO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago40% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | 1 day ago36% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago41% | 1 day ago34% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago20% | 1 day ago25% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFEIY has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFEIY jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFEIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CFEIY | 100% | N/A | ||
CHFLF - CFEIY | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HNFSA - CFEIY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PAVS - CFEIY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CFOO - CFEIY | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BFNH - CFEIY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BFNH have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BFNH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CFOO | 100% | N/A | ||
BFNH - CFOO | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CFEIY - CFOO | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BABB - CFOO | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
CIADY - CFOO | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
FNEVY - CFOO | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |