CFBK
Price
$22.97
Change
+$0.13 (+0.57%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
148.01M
17 days until earnings call
WASH
Price
$25.85
Change
+$0.40 (+1.57%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
495.16M
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFBK vs WASH

Header iconCFBK vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts CFBK vs WASHBanner chart's image
CF Bankshares
Price$22.97
Change+$0.13 (+0.57%)
Volume$28.21K
Capitalization148.01M
Washington Trust Ban
Price$25.85
Change+$0.40 (+1.57%)
Volume$221.87K
Capitalization495.16M
CFBK vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFBK vs. WASH commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFBK is a Hold and WASH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CFBK: $22.97 vs. WASH: $25.85)
Brand notoriety: CFBK and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFBK: 89% vs. WASH: 158%
Market capitalization -- CFBK: $148.01M vs. WASH: $495.16M
CFBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $148.01M. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $495.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WASH is a better buy in the short-term than CFBK.

Price Growth

CFBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WASH($495M) has a higher market cap than CFBK($148M). WASH has higher P/E ratio than CFBK: WASH (12.16) vs CFBK (8.29). CFBK YTD gains are higher at: -8.844 vs. WASH (-11.041). CFBK has less debt than WASH: CFBK (122M) vs WASH (1.06B). WASH has higher revenues than CFBK: WASH (111M) vs CFBK (55.5M).
CFBKWASHCFBK / WASH
Capitalization148M495M30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.844-11.04180%
P/E Ratio8.2912.1668%
Revenue55.5M111M50%
Total CashN/A44M-
Total Debt122M1.06B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3788
SMR RATING
1..100
5268
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8619
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WASH's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFBK (33) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WASH (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's SMR Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (80) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFBK (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WASH’s stock grew significantly faster than CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBKWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CZMVX16.710.09
+0.54%
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Inst
RYAVX75.850.32
+0.42%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value H
CSDGX15.500.05
+0.32%
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
FSSLX13.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Small Cap Core
NSNRX53.71-0.68
-1.25%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with FCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then FCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+0.57%
FCCO - CFBK
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
HIFS - CFBK
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
WTFC - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
CARE - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
WASH - CFBK
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
More

WASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WASH has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WASH jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WASH
1D Price
Change %
WASH100%
+1.57%
UBSI - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
STBA - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PEBO - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
TCBK - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
BY - WASH
85%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
More