CFBK
Price
$22.71
Change
+$0.15 (+0.66%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
146.34M
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GBFH
Price
$35.59
Change
+$0.17 (+0.48%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
509.51M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFBK vs GBFH

Header iconCFBK vs GBFH Comparison
Open Charts CFBK vs GBFHBanner chart's image
CF Bankshares
Price$22.71
Change+$0.15 (+0.66%)
Volume$19.08K
Capitalization146.34M
Gbank Financial Holdings
Price$35.59
Change+$0.17 (+0.48%)
Volume$68.26K
Capitalization509.51M
CFBK vs GBFH Comparison Chart in %
CFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFBK vs. GBFH commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFBK is a Hold and GBFH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CFBK: $22.71 vs. GBFH: $35.59)
Brand notoriety: CFBK and GBFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFBK: 75% vs. GBFH: 158%
Market capitalization -- CFBK: $146.34M vs. GBFH: $509.51M
CFBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $146.34M. GBFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $509.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFBK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGBFH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GBFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFBK and GBFH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBFH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GBFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the short-term than GBFH.

Price Growth

CFBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while GBFH (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

GBFH is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBFH($510M) has a higher market cap than CFBK($146M). GBFH has higher P/E ratio than CFBK: GBFH (28.08) vs CFBK (9.12). CFBK YTD gains are higher at: -10.171 vs. GBFH (-17.628). GBFH has less debt than CFBK: GBFH (32.2M) vs CFBK (122M).
CFBKGBFHCFBK / GBFH
Capitalization146M510M29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.171-17.62858%
P/E Ratio9.1228.0832%
Revenue55.5MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122M32.2M379%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBKGBFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GBFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDIVX17.800.09
+0.51%
JHancock Disciplined Value Intl NAV
NGISX19.070.02
+0.10%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core I.S
IVPOX21.98-0.07
-0.32%
Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port S
QASGX30.00-0.10
-0.33%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth A
CSGIX11.55-0.10
-0.86%
Calamos International Small Cap Gr I

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with CARE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then CARE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
-0.62%
CARE - CFBK
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CBAN - CFBK
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
BY - CFBK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
FCCO - CFBK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
ABCB - CFBK
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More

GBFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBFH has been loosely correlated with BCAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBFH jumps, then BCAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBFH
1D Price
Change %
GBFH100%
+4.95%
BCAL - GBFH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CFBK - GBFH
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CBNK - GBFH
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
CHMG - GBFH
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
CARE - GBFH
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More