CFBK
Price
$24.74
Change
+$0.44 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
159.51M
58 days until earnings call
CYVF
Price
$68.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
86.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFBK vs CYVF

Header iconCFBK vs CYVF Comparison
Open Charts CFBK vs CYVFBanner chart's image
CF Bankshares
Price$24.74
Change+$0.44 (+1.81%)
Volume$92.9K
Capitalization159.51M
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$68.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$888
Capitalization86.85M
CFBK vs CYVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFBK vs. CYVF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFBK is a Buy and CYVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFBK: $24.74 vs. CYVF: $68.00)
Brand notoriety: CFBK and CYVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFBK: 410% vs. CYVF: 37%
Market capitalization -- CFBK: $159.51M vs. CYVF: $86.85M
CFBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $159.51M. CYVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $86.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CYVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the long-term than CFBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the short-term than CYVF.

Price Growth

CFBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while CYVF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFBK($160M) has a higher market cap than CYVF($86.9M). CFBK has higher P/E ratio than CYVF: CFBK (8.93) vs CYVF (7.68). CYVF YTD gains are higher at: 8.592 vs. CFBK (-2.157). CYVF has less debt than CFBK: CYVF (39.5M) vs CFBK (122M). CFBK has higher revenues than CYVF: CFBK (55.5M) vs CYVF (34.3M).
CFBKCYVFCFBK / CYVF
Capitalization160M86.9M184%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.1578.592-25%
P/E Ratio8.937.68116%
Revenue55.5M34.3M162%
Total CashN/A12.1M-
Total Debt122M39.5M309%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK vs CYVF: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
CYVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3212
SMR RATING
1..100
5251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (36) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (52) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (70) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBKCYVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMTOY27.880.08
+0.29%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
PGINF4.16N/A
N/A
Prestige International Inc.
AMDLY46.00N/A
N/A
Amada Co. Ltd.
JNOMF0.01N/A
N/A
JUNO MINERALS LTD.
ELMTF0.20N/A
N/A
Element 25 Ltd.

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with FCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then FCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+1.81%
FCCO - CFBK
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
HIFS - CFBK
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
ZION - CFBK
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
UCB - CFBK
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
CARE - CFBK
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
N/A
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More