CFBK
Price
$23.81
Change
-$0.06 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
126.64M
8 days until earnings call
CYVF
Price
$66.50
Change
-$0.50 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
85.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFBK vs CYVF

Header iconCFBK vs CYVF Comparison
Open Charts CFBK vs CYVFBanner chart's image
CF Bankshares
Price$23.81
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
Volume$4.09K
Capitalization126.64M
Crystal Valley Financial
Price$66.50
Change-$0.50 (-0.75%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization85.94M
CFBK vs CYVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFBK vs. CYVF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFBK is a Hold and CYVF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CFBK: $23.81 vs. CYVF: $66.50)
Brand notoriety: CFBK and CYVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFBK: 15% vs. CYVF: 499%
Market capitalization -- CFBK: $126.64M vs. CYVF: $85.94M
CFBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $126.64M. CYVF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $85.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFBK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCYVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CYVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the long-term than CYVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CYVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYVF is a better buy in the short-term than CFBK.

Price Growth

CFBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while CYVF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFBK($127M) has a higher market cap than CYVF($85.9M). CYVF YTD gains are higher at: 5.452 vs. CFBK (-5.835).
CFBKCYVFCFBK / CYVF
Capitalization127M85.9M148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.8355.452-107%
P/E Ratio7.45N/A-
Revenue52MN/A-
Total Cash232MN/A-
Total Debt130MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK vs CYVF: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
CYVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3011
SMR RATING
1..100
4945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3360
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFBK's Valuation (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (39) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (30) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CYVF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CYVF’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CYVF (60) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to CYVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBKCYVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BETRF0.070.01
+9.46%
BETTERLIFE PHARMA INC.
GGCCX100.190.43
+0.43%
Gabelli Growth C
AZNIX12.090.03
+0.25%
Virtus Income & Growth Inst
FAERX38.58-0.07
-0.18%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas M
YGRAF0.76-0.02
-2.19%
Yangarra Resources Ltd.

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with AUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then AUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
-0.25%
AUB - CFBK
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
RF - CFBK
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
HOMB - CFBK
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
HBAN - CFBK
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
UCB - CFBK
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More

CYVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYVF and ILPMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYVF and ILPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYVF
1D Price
Change %
CYVF100%
-0.75%
ILPMY - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - CYVF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CFBK - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
FSUN - CYVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
SSBI - CYVF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More