CF
Price
$85.02
Change
+$2.15 (+2.59%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.93B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MOS
Price
$27.64
Change
+$1.44 (+5.49%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.77B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs MOS

Header iconCF vs MOS Comparison
Open Charts CF vs MOSBanner chart's image
CF Industries Holding
Price$85.02
Change+$2.15 (+2.59%)
Volume$55.64K
Capitalization12.93B
Mosaic Company (The)
Price$27.64
Change+$1.44 (+5.49%)
Volume$69.41K
Capitalization8.77B
CF vs MOS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CF vs. MOS commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and MOS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $82.87 vs. MOS: $26.21)
Brand notoriety: CF and MOS are both notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 105% vs. MOS: 101%
Market capitalization -- CF: $12.93B vs. MOS: $8.32B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $12.93B. MOS’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $8.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than MOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MOS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the short-term than MOS.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while MOS (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

MOS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+4.65% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than MOS($8.77B). CF has higher P/E ratio than MOS: CF (10.02) vs MOS (7.16). MOS YTD gains are higher at: 8.800 vs. CF (7.150). CF (3.1B) and MOS (2.97B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CF has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. MOS (153M). CF has less debt than MOS: CF (3.4B) vs MOS (4.8B). MOS has higher revenues than CF: MOS (11.9B) vs CF (6.74B).
CFMOSCF / MOS
Capitalization12.9B8.77B147%
EBITDA3.1B2.97B105%
Gain YTD7.1508.80081%
P/E Ratio10.027.16140%
Revenue6.74B11.9B57%
Total Cash1.84B153M1,201%
Total Debt3.4B4.8B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs MOS: Fundamental Ratings
CF
MOS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4990
SMR RATING
1..100
3571
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8799
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3148

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MOS's Valuation (30) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (53). This means that MOS’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (90). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (35) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOS (71). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOS’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as MOS (63). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.

CF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as MOS (99). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to MOS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFMOS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MOS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALU19.110.38
+2.03%
Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares
PSFD37.77-0.09
-0.25%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF
HFXI33.71-0.16
-0.47%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF
FFGX31.73-0.24
-0.76%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
ZSL3.31-0.12
-3.50%
ProShares UltraShort Silver

CF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CF
1D Price
Change %
CF100%
+2.57%
NTR - CF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
MOS - CF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
IPI - CF
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
CTVA - CF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
UAN - CF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

MOS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOS has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOS jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOS
1D Price
Change %
MOS100%
+1.91%
NTR - MOS
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.35%
CF - MOS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
IPI - MOS
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
CTVA - MOS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
ICL - MOS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More