CF
Price
$85.02
Change
+$2.15 (+2.59%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.93B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICL
Price
$5.51
Change
+$0.10 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs ICL

Header iconCF vs ICL Comparison
Open Charts CF vs ICLBanner chart's image
CF Industries Holding
Price$85.02
Change+$2.15 (+2.59%)
Volume$55.64K
Capitalization12.93B
ICL Group
Price$5.51
Change+$0.10 (+1.85%)
Volume$30.49K
Capitalization7B
CF vs ICL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CF vs. ICL commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and ICL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $82.87 vs. ICL: $5.41)
Brand notoriety: CF: Notable vs. ICL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 105% vs. ICL: 143%
Market capitalization -- CF: $12.93B vs. ICL: $7B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $12.93B. ICL’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ICL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than ICL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ICL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the short-term than ICL.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

ICL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+4.65% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than ICL($7B). ICL has higher P/E ratio than CF: ICL (18.66) vs CF (10.02). CF YTD gains are higher at: 7.150 vs. ICL (-5.254). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.1B vs. ICL (1.42B). CF has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. ICL (476M). ICL has less debt than CF: ICL (2.68B) vs CF (3.4B). ICL (7.05B) and CF (6.74B) have equivalent revenues.
CFICLCF / ICL
Capitalization12.9B7B184%
EBITDA3.1B1.42B219%
Gain YTD7.150-5.254-136%
P/E Ratio10.0218.6654%
Revenue6.74B7.05B96%
Total Cash1.84B476M386%
Total Debt3.4B2.68B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs ICL: Fundamental Ratings
CF
ICL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4981
SMR RATING
1..100
3582
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (25) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (53). This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (81). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (35) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (82). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (61). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (87). This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFICL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRINX26.400.08
+0.30%
Neuberger Intrinsic Value R6
VYMVX15.11-0.01
-0.07%
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap R
GSDPX55.19-0.07
-0.13%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq P
CFNCX95.11-0.23
-0.24%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529C
ASIYX29.13-0.10
-0.34%
Invesco Asia Pacific Equity Y

CF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CF
1D Price
Change %
CF100%
+2.57%
NTR - CF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.35%
MOS - CF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
IPI - CF
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
CTVA - CF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
UAN - CF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
+0.37%
MOS - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
CTVA - ICL
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
CF - ICL
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
NTR - ICL
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
KPLUY - ICL
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
More