CF
Price
$92.50
Change
+$3.89 (+4.39%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.43B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICL
Price
$5.53
Change
-$1.19 (-17.71%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.07B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs ICL

Header iconCF vs ICL Comparison
Open Charts CF vs ICLBanner chart's image
CF Industries Holding
Price$92.50
Change+$3.89 (+4.39%)
Volume$1.85M
Capitalization14.43B
ICL Group
Price$5.53
Change-$1.19 (-17.71%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization7.07B
CF vs ICL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CF vs. ICL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Buy and ICL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $92.50 vs. ICL: $5.53)
Brand notoriety: CF: Notable vs. ICL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 78% vs. ICL: 120%
Market capitalization -- CF: $14.43B vs. ICL: $7.07B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $14.43B. ICL’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $7.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $50.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ICL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than ICL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ICL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ICL is a better buy in the short-term than CF.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

ICL is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-3.11% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($14.4B) has a higher market cap than ICL($7.07B). ICL has higher P/E ratio than CF: ICL (19.07) vs CF (11.19). CF YTD gains are higher at: 19.602 vs. ICL (-3.152). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.1B vs. ICL (1.42B). CF has more cash in the bank: 1.84B vs. ICL (476M). ICL has less debt than CF: ICL (2.68B) vs CF (3.4B). ICL (7.05B) and CF (6.74B) have equivalent revenues.
CFICLCF / ICL
Capitalization14.4B7.07B204%
EBITDA3.1B1.42B219%
Gain YTD19.602-3.152-622%
P/E Ratio11.1919.0759%
Revenue6.74B7.05B96%
Total Cash1.84B476M386%
Total Debt3.4B2.68B127%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs ICL: Fundamental Ratings
CF
ICL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4886
SMR RATING
1..100
3482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7650
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (25) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (67). This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (86). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (34) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (82). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (78). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (76). This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFICL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGMIX68.352.80
+4.27%
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R6
VVIAX78.980.40
+0.51%
Vanguard Value Index Adm
FMUFX16.13N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
CLFFX23.63-0.02
-0.08%
Lone Peak Value Investor
DTCCX14.41-0.11
-0.76%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C

CF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CF
1D Price
Change %
CF100%
+2.96%
NTR - CF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
MOS - CF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
CTVA - CF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
YARIY - CF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
ICL - CF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
More

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
+3.17%
MOS - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
CTVA - ICL
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
CF - ICL
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
KPLUY - ICL
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
NTR - ICL
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
More