CF
Price
$83.51
Change
+$0.49 (+0.59%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.53B
17 days until earnings call
ICL
Price
$6.28
Change
+$0.06 (+0.96%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.19B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs ICL

Header iconCF vs ICL Comparison
Open Charts CF vs ICLBanner chart's image
CF Industries Holding
Price$83.51
Change+$0.49 (+0.59%)
Volume$2.16M
Capitalization13.53B
ICL Group
Price$6.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.96%)
Volume$353.35K
Capitalization8.19B
CF vs ICL Comparison Chart in %
CF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CF vs. ICL commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and ICL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CF: $83.51 vs. ICL: $6.28)
Brand notoriety: CF: Notable vs. ICL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 87% vs. ICL: 55%
Market capitalization -- CF: $13.53B vs. ICL: $8.19B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $13.53B. ICL’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $8.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $41.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ICL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CF and ICL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ICL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CF and ICL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

ICL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.22% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than ICL($8.19B). ICL has higher P/E ratio than CF: ICL (21.66) vs CF (10.94). ICL YTD gains are higher at: 29.672 vs. CF (-0.356). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.95B vs. ICL (1.39B). CF has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. ICL (701M). ICL has less debt than CF: ICL (2.92B) vs CF (3.33B). ICL has higher revenues than CF: ICL (6.95B) vs CF (6.45B).
CFICLCF / ICL
Capitalization13.5B8.19B165%
EBITDA2.95B1.39B212%
Gain YTD-0.35629.672-1%
P/E Ratio10.9421.6651%
Revenue6.45B6.95B93%
Total Cash1.69B701M241%
Total Debt3.33B2.92B114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs ICL: Fundamental Ratings
CF
ICL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4365
SMR RATING
1..100
3882
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8310
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (29) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (41). This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (65). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (38) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (82). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (57). This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is significantly better than the same rating for CF (83). This means that ICL’s stock grew significantly faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFICL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRLTX19.680.09
+0.46%
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth N
VDVIX15.090.01
+0.07%
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Inv
GCITX17.540.01
+0.06%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Inv
TTISX13.81-0.09
-0.65%
Nuveen Quant Intl Sm Cap Eq Retirement
MICFX17.59-0.15
-0.85%
Matthews China Instl

CF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CF
1D Price
Change %
CF100%
+0.59%
NTR - CF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
MOS - CF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
UAN - CF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
YARIY - CF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
CTVA - CF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
More

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
+0.96%
MOS - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
NTR - ICL
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
CTVA - ICL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CF - ICL
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
KPLUY - ICL
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
More