It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -2.48% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.09%.
CF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
CF | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CF | FTDS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago75% | 24 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTDS has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTDS jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FTDS | 100% | -0.22% | ||
ZION - FTDS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
NOC - FTDS | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
CF - FTDS | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
OZK - FTDS | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
NUE - FTDS | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
More |