Advertisement
CEVMY vs OAMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEVMY is a StrongBuy and OAMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEVMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOAMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CEVMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- OAMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CEVMY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OAMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CEVMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- OAMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CEVMY (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OAMCF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +29.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (+1.25% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| CEVMY | OAMCF | CEVMY / OAMCF | |
| Capitalization | 8.98B | 28M | 32,068% |
| EBITDA | 603M | -4.65M | -12,976% |
| Gain YTD | -1.091 | 25.930 | -4% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.20 | 40.91 | 62% |
| Revenue | 2.9B | 30.1M | 9,635% |
| Total Cash | 1.4B | 5.07M | 27,644% |
| Total Debt | 117M | 3.67M | 3,185% |
| CEVMY | OAMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LIAE | 215.21 | 0.81 | +0.38% |
| LifeX 2050 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF | |||
| ICAP | 27.73 | 0.10 | +0.37% |
| Infrastructure Capital Equity Income ETF | |||
| DVDN | 19.88 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF | |||
| RWJ | 48.01 | 0.06 | +0.13% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | |||
| WCLD | 35.78 | -0.15 | -0.42% |
| WisdomTree Cloud Computing ETF | |||
CEVMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVMY and CPOP have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVMY and CPOP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEVMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEVMY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPOP - CEVMY | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| CYFWF - CEVMY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APHP - CEVMY | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| RSVR - CEVMY | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| OAMCF - CEVMY | -1% Poorly correlated | -6.44% | ||
More | ||||
OAMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OAMCF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAMCF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAMCF | 100% | -6.44% | ||
| MCOIF - OAMCF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CYFWF - OAMCF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RSVR - OAMCF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ENTEF - OAMCF | 1% Poorly correlated | +19.82% | ||
| CEVMY - OAMCF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||