CEVMF vs CJREF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEVMF is a Hold and CJREF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEVMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCJREF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CEVMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CJREF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CEVMF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CJREF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was -11.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +49.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CJREF is expected to report earnings on Jan 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (-0.64% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| CEVMF | CJREF | CEVMF / CJREF | |
| Capitalization | 6.53B | 218M | 2,997% |
| EBITDA | 452M | -13.36M | -3,383% |
| Gain YTD | 36.637 | -85.097 | -43% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.04 | 3.10 | 840% |
| Revenue | 2.15B | 1.51B | 142% |
| Total Cash | 1.36B | 56.2M | 2,422% |
| Total Debt | 120M | 1.25B | 10% |
CEVMF | CJREF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CJREF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEVMF (81). This means that CJREF’s stock grew significantly faster than CEVMF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CJREF (100). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CJREF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CJREF (98). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CJREF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJREF (96). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJREF’s over the last 12 months.
CEVMF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CJREF (95). This means that CEVMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CJREF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CEVMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CEVMF and MCOIF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEVMF and MCOIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEVMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEVMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCOIF - CEVMF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CJREF - CEVMF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICABY - CEVMF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCHOY - CEVMF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DTTVY - CEVMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CJREF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CJREF and MHSDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CJREF and MHSDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CJREF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJREF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MHSDF - CJREF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LLYVB - CJREF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BOIVF - CJREF | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
| MCOIF - CJREF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CEVMF - CJREF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||