Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs WBIRX
CEUFX vs WBIRX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs WBIRX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.41
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
William Blair International Growth R6
Price$30.98
Change-$0.16 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
CEUFX vs WBIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. WBIRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and WBIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. WBIRX (1.34B). WBIRX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: WBIRX (1.41) vs CEUFX (0.83). CEUFX was incepted earlier than WBIRX: CEUFX (23 years) vs WBIRX (6 years). CEUFX (0.91) and WBIRX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . WBIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBIRX: CEUFX (250) vs WBIRX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. WBIRX (6.13). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.01 vs. WBIRX (-1.89).
| CEUFX | WBIRX | CEUFX / WBIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.85 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.521 | 13.314 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.34B | 10,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 6.13 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 14.31 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.01 | -1.89 | -900% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement