Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$59.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.70
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.97M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and MNOZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. MNOZX (368M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs CEUFX (0.83). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (30.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.11 vs. CEUFX (5.30). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.82 vs. CEUFX (19.17).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.66 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.71 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.081 | 14.188 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 368M | 36,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 12.11 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.62 | 43.81 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.17 | 53.82 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement