Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.10
Change+$0.31 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.80
Change+$0.38 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.61M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. MNOZX (362M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs CEUFX (0.81). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). CEUFX (8.72) and MNOZX (8.44) have marching annual gain over last year. MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.64 vs. CEUFX (13.84).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.829 | 13.317 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 362M | 36,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | 8.44 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.34 | 46.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.84 | 36.64 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers