Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.41
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.67M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (367M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs CEUFX (0.83). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). MNOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. CEUFX (9.87). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.86 vs. CEUFX (17.01).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.521 | 14.250 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 367M | 36,785% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 13.57 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 42.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.01 | 47.86 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement