Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.64
Change-$1.74 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$37.53
Change+$0.72 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.73M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and MNOZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (325M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than MNOZX: CEUFX (2.77) vs MNOZX (1.19). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. MNOZX (12.43). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 20.53 vs. CEUFX (-2.59).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.668 | 1.597 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 325M | 41,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 1.19 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 12.43 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 32.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.59 | 20.53 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers