Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs MNOZX
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.42M
CEUFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (358M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs CEUFX (0.81). CEUFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: CEUFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. MNOZX (3.66). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 40.23 vs. CEUFX (18.38).
| CEUFX | MNOZX | CEUFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.66 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.71 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.616 | 13.223 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 358M | 37,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 3.66 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.69 | 59.41 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.38 | 40.23 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.90 | N/A | - |