Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.64
Change-$1.74 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$23.64
Change+$0.94 (+4.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.34B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and GSIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. GSIMX (56.3B). CEUFX pays higher dividends than GSIMX: CEUFX (2.77) vs GSIMX (2.40). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). GSIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.17 vs. CEUFX (18.33). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 48.69 vs. CEUFX (-2.59).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.668 | 5.207 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 56.3B | 240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 2.40 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 20.17 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 49.26 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.59 | 48.69 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers