Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$59.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$22.70
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.94B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and GSIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. GSIMX (53.9B). GSIMX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: GSIMX (1.90) vs CEUFX (0.83). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CEUFX (30.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. GSIMX (-1.43). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.26 vs. CEUFX (19.17).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.77 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.80 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.081 | 16.053 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 53.9B | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | -1.43 | -371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.62 | 45.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.17 | 60.26 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement