Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs GSIMX
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs GSIMX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
Price$22.63
Change+$0.14 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.55B
CEUFX vs GSIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. GSIMX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and GSIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. GSIMX (53.5B). GSIMX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: GSIMX (1.90) vs CEUFX (0.81). CEUFX was incepted earlier than GSIMX: CEUFX (23 years) vs GSIMX (9 years). CEUFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GSIMX (0.80). GSIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CEUFX (35.00). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSIMX: CEUFX (250) vs GSIMX (1000000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. GSIMX (-1.77). GSIMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.12 vs. CEUFX (18.76).
| CEUFX | GSIMX | CEUFX / GSIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.995 | 15.695 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 53.5B | 252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.90 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | -1.77 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 63.27 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.76 | 52.12 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.42 | N/A | - |