Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FNGZX
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FNGZX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.79
Change-$1.11 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
Price$17.86
Change-$0.35 (-1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets793.51M
CEUFX vs FNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FNGZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FNGZX (794M). FNGZX pays higher dividends than CEUFX: FNGZX (1.85) vs CEUFX (0.76). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FNGZX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FNGZX (17 years). FNGZX (0.95) and CEUFX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNGZX (17.56). CEUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGZX: CEUFX (250) vs FNGZX (100000). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.34 vs. FNGZX (5.92). CEUFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.58 vs. FNGZX (-6.66).
| CEUFX | FNGZX | CEUFX / FNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.87 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.95 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.929 | 11.513 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 794M | 17,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.34 | 5.92 | 293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.07 | 22.46 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | -6.66 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.84 | 78.91 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement