Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.52
Change+$0.42 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.54
Change+$0.30 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets778M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (778M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.81) vs FCIWX (0.64). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.25 vs. FCIWX (3.18). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 40.81 vs. CEUFX (15.03).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.626 | 7.673 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 778M | 17,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.64 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.25 | 3.18 | 354% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.77 | 41.21 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.03 | 40.81 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement