Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$60.41
Change-$0.32 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.61M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCIWX (879M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.83) vs FCIWX (0.63). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. FCIWX (5.77). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 45.45 vs. CEUFX (17.01).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.521 | 7.858 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 879M | 15,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 5.77 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 38.30 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.01 | 45.45 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement