Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$62.64
Change-$1.74 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.75
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.02M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCIWX (711M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (2.77) vs FCIWX (0.90). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (25.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. FCIWX (6.18). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 28.54 vs. CEUFX (-2.59).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.668 | -1.114 | -509% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 711M | 18,987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.90 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 6.18 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 25.20 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.59 | 28.54 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers