Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$59.65
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets886.39M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FCIWX (886M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.83) vs FCIWX (0.63). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.92) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIWX (12.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. FCIWX (4.17). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 54.91 vs. CEUFX (19.17).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.80 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.89 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.081 | 9.085 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 886M | 15,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | 4.17 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.62 | 45.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.17 | 54.91 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement