Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$64.79
Change-$1.11 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.91
Change-$0.18 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets758.11M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FCIWX (758M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.76) vs FCIWX (0.62). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. FCIWX (9.19). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. CEUFX (10.69).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.825 | 9.945 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 758M | 18,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 9.19 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.93 | 39.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.69 | 34.60 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement