Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEUFX vs FCIWX
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts CEUFX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC 529-F-1
Price$61.18
Change-$0.12 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.75B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets828.73M
CEUFX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEUFX vs. FCIWX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEUFX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEUFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FCIWX (829M). CEUFX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: CEUFX (0.84) vs FCIWX (0.66). CEUFX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: CEUFX (23 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). CEUFX (0.91) and FCIWX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CEUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEUFX: FCIWX (0) vs CEUFX (250). CEUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. FCIWX (0.65). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 39.29 vs. CEUFX (14.04).
| CEUFX | FCIWX | CEUFX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.80 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.89 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.209 | 6.262 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 829M | 16,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.66 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.82 | 0.65 | 1,202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.76 | 33.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.04 | 39.29 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement