Advertisement
CETY vs MWA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CETY is a Hold and MWA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CETY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CETY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CETY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MWA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CETY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MWA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CETY (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -3.10% price change this week, while MWA (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
MWA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-0.16% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CETY | MWA | CETY / MWA | |
| Capitalization | 6.32M | 4.23B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -1.68M | 320M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 5.585 | 13.644 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.33 | 22.19 | 2% |
| Revenue | 2.28M | 1.43B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 1.06M | 432M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 3.7M | 452M | 1% |
CETY | MWA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CETY's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MWA (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CETY’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.
MWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for CETY (100) in the null industry. This means that MWA’s stock grew significantly faster than CETY’s over the last 12 months.
MWA's SMR Rating (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CETY (98) in the null industry. This means that MWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CETY’s over the last 12 months.
MWA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CETY (66) in the null industry. This means that MWA’s stock grew similarly to CETY’s over the last 12 months.
CETY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MWA (81) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CETY’s stock grew similarly to MWA’s over the last 12 months.
| CETY | MWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
CETY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CETY has been loosely correlated with HIZOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CETY jumps, then HIZOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CETY | 100% | +7.21% | ||
| HIZOF - CETY | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CHRHF - CETY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GHM - CETY | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MWA - CETY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| OTIS - CETY | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||
MWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MWA has been loosely correlated with SPXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MWA jumps, then SPXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWA | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| SPXC - MWA | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| FELE - MWA | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| GGG - MWA | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| WTS - MWA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| PNR - MWA | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||