| CET | SPY | CET / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 3.053 | 1.116 | 274% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 715B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | 0.09 | - |
| Turnover | 8.62 | 3.00 | 287% |
| Yield | 1.34 | 1.05 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 33 years | - |
| CET | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CET and SCHW have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CET and SCHW's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||