CET | SPY | CET / SPY | |
Gain YTD | 10.982 | 14.355 | 77% |
Net Assets | 1.75B | 670B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | 0.09 | - |
Turnover | 8.62 | 3.00 | 287% |
Yield | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
Fund Existence | 45 years | 33 years | - |
CET | SPY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 17 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 9 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CET and SCHW have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CET and SCHW's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPY | 100% | +0.57% | ||
MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More |