Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CESGX vs RMFCX
CESGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CESGX vs RMFCX
Coho Relative Value ESG
Price$1.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.34K
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
CESGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CESGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESGX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CESGX (353K). CESGX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CESGX (916.63) vs RMFCX (1.21). CESGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CESGX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CESGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CESGX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CESGX: RMFCX (250) vs CESGX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. CESGX (-2.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. CESGX (9.20).
| CESGX | RMFCX | CESGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.400 | 15.093 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353K | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 916.63 | 1.21 | 75,823% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.80 | 6.67 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.87 | 30.56 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | 54.90 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement