CESDF
Price
$5.09
Change
+$0.11 (+2.21%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
536.01M
THNPY
Price
$39.70
Change
-$0.47 (-1.17%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs THNPY

Header iconCESDF vs THNPY Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs THNPYBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$5.09
Change+$0.11 (+2.21%)
Volume$657
Capitalization536.01M
Technip Energies
Price$39.70
Change-$0.47 (-1.17%)
Volume$3.52K
Capitalization4.01B
CESDF vs THNPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. THNPY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Hold and THNPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $5.09 vs. THNPY: $39.70)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and THNPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 10% vs. THNPY: 42%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. THNPY: $4.01B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. THNPY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • THNPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, THNPY is a better buy in the long-term than CESDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

THNPY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • THNPY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.39% price change this week, while THNPY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

THNPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.43% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). THNPY has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: THNPY (11.88) vs CESDF (6.26). THNPY YTD gains are higher at: 53.689 vs. CESDF (-26.065). THNPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 592M vs. CESDF (266M). THNPY has higher revenues than CESDF: THNPY (6.28B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFTHNPYCESDF / THNPY
Capitalization536M4.01B13%
EBITDA266M592M45%
Gain YTD-26.06553.689-49%
P/E Ratio6.2611.8853%
Revenue2.08B6.28B33%
Total Cash0N/A-
Total Debt513MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
THNPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FZROX20.72-0.25
-1.19%
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index
ISFIX17.48-0.22
-1.24%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core I
IRMAX9.30-0.13
-1.38%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port A
VCSTX33.99-0.50
-1.45%
VALIC Company I Science & Technology
HNCTX20.28-0.35
-1.70%
Hartford International Growth R5

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with TOLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then TOLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+2.29%
TOLWF - CESDF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
VAL - CESDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
OII - CESDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
SUBCY - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
PUMP - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
More

THNPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THNPY has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THNPY jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPY
1D Price
Change %
THNPY100%
-1.17%
SUBCY - THNPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
TTI - THNPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
CESDF - THNPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
VAL - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
PUMP - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
More