CESDF
Price
$5.19
Change
+$0.24 (+4.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
536.01M
THNPY
Price
$41.85
Change
-$0.45 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs THNPY

Header iconCESDF vs THNPY Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs THNPYBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$5.19
Change+$0.24 (+4.85%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization536.01M
Technip Energies
Price$41.85
Change-$0.45 (-1.06%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization4.01B
CESDF vs THNPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. THNPY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Buy and THNPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $5.19 vs. THNPY: $41.85)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and THNPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 21% vs. THNPY: 183%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. THNPY: $4.01B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. THNPY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • THNPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, THNPY is a better buy in the long-term than CESDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THNPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • THNPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than THNPY.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while THNPY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

THNPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($536M). THNPY has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: THNPY (11.88) vs CESDF (6.26). THNPY YTD gains are higher at: 62.012 vs. CESDF (-24.673). THNPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 592M vs. CESDF (266M). THNPY has higher revenues than CESDF: THNPY (6.28B) vs CESDF (2.08B).
CESDFTHNPYCESDF / THNPY
Capitalization536M4.01B13%
EBITDA266M592M45%
Gain YTD-24.67362.012-40%
P/E Ratio6.2611.8853%
Revenue2.08B6.28B33%
Total Cash0N/A-
Total Debt513MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFTHNPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAPH54.880.54
+1.00%
SAP SE ADRHEDGED SAPH
SBIO30.850.21
+0.69%
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
IVOG115.440.56
+0.49%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
EFZ13.81-0.01
-0.09%
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
ERC9.55-0.06
-0.62%
Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with TOLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then TOLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+4.89%
TOLWF - CESDF
41%
Loosely correlated
+16.59%
VAL - CESDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
OII - CESDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
SUBCY - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
PUMP - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More

THNPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THNPY has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THNPY jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPY
1D Price
Change %
THNPY100%
-1.06%
SUBCY - THNPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
TTI - THNPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - THNPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
VAL - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
PUMP - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More