CESDF
Price
$6.52
Change
+$0.03 (+0.46%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
PUMP
Price
$5.52
Change
+$0.26 (+4.94%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
573.9M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs PUMP

Header iconCESDF vs PUMP Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs PUMPBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
Volume$28.95K
Capitalization1.42B
ProPetro Holding
Price$5.52
Change+$0.26 (+4.94%)
Volume$3.03M
Capitalization573.9M
CESDF vs PUMP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. PUMP commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a StrongBuy and PUMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.52 vs. PUMP: $5.52)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and PUMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 109% vs. PUMP: 105%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $1.42B vs. PUMP: $573.9M
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.42B. PUMP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $573.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePUMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PUMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than PUMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUMP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PUMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than PUMP.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while PUMP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +13.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

PUMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CESDF($1.42B) has a higher market cap than PUMP($574M). PUMP has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: PUMP (23.56) vs CESDF (11.33). CESDF YTD gains are higher at: -5.370 vs. PUMP (-40.836). CESDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 370M vs. PUMP (-887K). PUMP has less debt than CESDF: PUMP (167M) vs CESDF (471M). CESDF has higher revenues than PUMP: CESDF (2.42B) vs PUMP (1.37B).
CESDFPUMPCESDF / PUMP
Capitalization1.42B574M248%
EBITDA370M-887K-41,714%
Gain YTD-5.370-40.83613%
P/E Ratio11.3323.5648%
Revenue2.42B1.37B177%
Total CashN/A83M-
Total Debt471M167M282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs PUMP: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
PUMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
4095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (68) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUMP (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUMP (95) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PUMP (61) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to PUMP’s over the last 12 months.

PUMP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CESDF (26) in the null industry. This means that PUMP’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFPUMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYOIX71.561.06
+1.50%
Rydex Biotechnology Inv
JSCRX19.690.24
+1.23%
PGIM Jennison Small Company R
NCTWX33.370.35
+1.06%
Nicholas II I
MSGRX13.340.11
+0.83%
Meridian Small Cap Growth Institutional
PRBLX64.950.34
+0.53%
Parnassus Core Equity Investor

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with TOLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then TOLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+0.43%
TOLWF - CESDF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
VAL - CESDF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
OII - CESDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
SUBCY - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
PUMP - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.94%
More

PUMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PUMP has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PUMP jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUMP
1D Price
Change %
PUMP100%
+4.94%
LBRT - PUMP
82%
Closely correlated
+2.99%
RES - PUMP
82%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
OII - PUMP
76%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
HAL - PUMP
75%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
WHD - PUMP
74%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
More