CESDF
Price
$6.74
Change
-$0.27 (-3.85%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTI
Price
$43.16
Change
+$0.25 (+0.58%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.46B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs FTI

Header iconCESDF vs FTI Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs FTIBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$6.74
Change-$0.27 (-3.85%)
Volume$943
Capitalization1.49B
TechnipFMC
Price$43.16
Change+$0.25 (+0.58%)
Volume$2.11M
Capitalization17.46B
CESDF vs FTI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. FTI commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Hold and FTI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $6.74 vs. FTI: $43.16)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and FTI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 3% vs. FTI: 39%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $1.49B vs. FTI: $17.46B
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.49B. FTI’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $17.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than FTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CESDF and FTI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTI is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTI($17.5B) has a higher market cap than CESDF($1.49B). FTI has higher P/E ratio than CESDF: FTI (19.44) vs CESDF (11.80). FTI YTD gains are higher at: 48.986 vs. CESDF (1.778). FTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. CESDF (370M). CESDF has less debt than FTI: CESDF (471M) vs FTI (1.6B). FTI has higher revenues than CESDF: FTI (9.48B) vs CESDF (2.42B).
CESDFFTICESDF / FTI
Capitalization1.49B17.5B9%
EBITDA370M1.6B23%
Gain YTD1.77848.9864%
P/E Ratio11.8019.4461%
Revenue2.42B9.48B25%
Total CashN/A950M-
Total Debt471M1.6B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs FTI: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
FTI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6917
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
206
SMR RATING
1..100
3933
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (71). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (20). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (39). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CESDF (41). This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FTI (41). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFFTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USD112.382.17
+1.97%
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
GINX30.550.14
+0.46%
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
EFT11.510.04
+0.31%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust
VCLN26.84N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
MHNC17.61-0.21
-1.18%
MAIDEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA Ltd

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
-1.92%
SUBCY - CESDF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
FTI - CESDF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
OII - CESDF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
NOV - CESDF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
WFRD - CESDF
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
More

FTI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been closely correlated with BKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then BKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTI
1D Price
Change %
FTI100%
-1.45%
BKR - FTI
72%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
OII - FTI
72%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
SLB - FTI
68%
Closely correlated
-4.09%
WFRD - FTI
67%
Closely correlated
-4.83%
OIS - FTI
66%
Closely correlated
-3.36%
More