CESDF
Price
$5.19
Change
+$0.24 (+4.85%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
536.01M
CFWFF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
322.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CESDF vs CFWFF

Header iconCESDF vs CFWFF Comparison
Open Charts CESDF vs CFWFFBanner chart's image
CES Energy Solutions
Price$5.19
Change+$0.24 (+4.85%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization536.01M
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.50
Change-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Volume$400
Capitalization322.08M
CESDF vs CFWFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CESDF vs. CFWFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CESDF is a Buy and CFWFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CESDF: $5.19 vs. CFWFF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: CESDF and CFWFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CESDF: 21% vs. CFWFF: 31%
Market capitalization -- CESDF: $536.01M vs. CFWFF: $322.08M
CESDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $536.01M. CFWFF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $322.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CESDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFWFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CESDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CESDF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFWFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CESDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CESDF is a better buy in the short-term than CFWFF.

Price Growth

CESDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.17% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CESDF($536M) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($322M). CESDF has higher P/E ratio than CFWFF: CESDF (6.26) vs CFWFF (3.98). CFWFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.371 vs. CESDF (-24.673). CESDF (266M) and CFWFF (264M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CFWFF has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. CESDF (0). CFWFF has less debt than CESDF: CFWFF (365M) vs CESDF (513M). CESDF has higher revenues than CFWFF: CESDF (2.08B) vs CFWFF (1.7B).
CESDFCFWFFCESDF / CFWFF
Capitalization536M322M166%
EBITDA266M264M101%
Gain YTD-24.673-5.371459%
P/E Ratio6.263.98157%
Revenue2.08B1.7B122%
Total Cash023.2M-
Total Debt513M365M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CESDF vs CFWFF: Fundamental Ratings
CESDF
CFWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
4187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CESDF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (52). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFWFF (100). This means that CESDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFWFF (87). This means that CESDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CESDF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (62). This means that CESDF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CESDF (72). This means that CFWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CESDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CESDFCFWFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CESDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLBEX31.810.42
+1.34%
Plumb Equity Investor
SMFYX41.510.38
+0.92%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Y
FMCVX25.760.17
+0.66%
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6
AFYCX25.540.13
+0.51%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
CSJIX68.170.12
+0.18%
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares I

CESDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CESDF has been loosely correlated with TOLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CESDF jumps, then TOLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CESDF
1D Price
Change %
CESDF100%
+4.89%
TOLWF - CESDF
41%
Loosely correlated
+16.59%
VAL - CESDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
OII - CESDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
SUBCY - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
PUMP - CESDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and TOLWF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and TOLWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-3.02%
TOLWF - CFWFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+16.59%
CESDF - CFWFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
SAPMY - CFWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRD - CFWFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
THNPY - CFWFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More