Advertisement
CERS vs HAE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CERS is a Hold and HAE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CERS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CERS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HAE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CERS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CERS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HAE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CERS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -2.97% price change this week, while HAE (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CERS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
HAE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+3.38% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| CERS | HAE | CERS / HAE | |
| Capitalization | 440M | 3.09B | 14% |
| EBITDA | -5.87M | 357M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | 11.165 | -17.717 | -63% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.28 | - |
| Revenue | 199M | 1.33B | 15% |
| Total Cash | 78.5M | 296M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 98.2M | 1.23B | 8% |
CERS | HAE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CERS's Valuation (40) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as HAE (66). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to HAE’s over the last 12 months.
CERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as HAE (100). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to HAE’s over the last 12 months.
HAE's SMR Rating (47) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CERS (96). This means that HAE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.
CERS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as HAE (56). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to HAE’s over the last 12 months.
HAE's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CERS (100). This means that HAE’s stock grew similarly to CERS’s over the last 12 months.
| CERS | HAE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 29 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
CERS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CERS has been loosely correlated with PACB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CERS jumps, then PACB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CERS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERS | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| PACB - CERS | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.41% | ||
| HAE - CERS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| ICUI - CERS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| GMED - CERS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| UTMD - CERS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
HAE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAE has been loosely correlated with MXCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAE jumps, then MXCT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAE | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| MXCT - HAE | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.62% | ||
| INBS - HAE | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.14% | ||
| UFPT - HAE | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| ECOR - HAE | 42% Loosely correlated | -8.57% | ||
| ATR - HAE | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
More | ||||