CENT vs HLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENT is a Hold and HLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CENT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CENT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CENT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CENT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CENT (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
CENT is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
HLF is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.45% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CENT | HLF | CENT / HLF | |
| Capitalization | 2.69B | 1B | 268% |
| EBITDA | 319M | 482M | 66% |
| Gain YTD | -8.015 | 26.457 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.91 | 6.42 | 326% |
| Revenue | 3.32B | 5.06B | 66% |
| Total Cash | 341M | 575M | 59% |
| Total Debt | 1.38B | 2.77B | 50% |
CENT | HLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLF's Valuation (62) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CENT (80) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to CENT’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CENT (76) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CENT’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CENT (55) in the Consumer Sundries industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to CENT’s over the last 12 months.
CENT's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Consumer Sundries industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (92) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CENT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CENT | HLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 64% | 18 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 68% |
CENT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENT has been closely correlated with CENTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CENT jumps, then CENTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | 100% | -3.44% | ||
| CENTA - CENT | 98% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| USNA - CENT | 38% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| BGS - CENT | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| FLO - CENT | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| WEST - CENT | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -4.19% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| HAIN - HLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.16% | ||
| BYND - HLF | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.12% | ||
| CENTA - HLF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.44% | ||
More | ||||