Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWBX
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWBX
Causeway Emerging Markets Instl
Price$15.93
Change+$1.74 (+12.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.42B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEMIX (3.42B). CEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMIX (1.12) vs RNWBX (0.45). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMIX (1.14). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.74 vs. RNWBX (26.27). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| CEMIX | RNWBX | CEMIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.66 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.242 | 5.996 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 75.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.45 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.74 | 26.27 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.20 | 38.81 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.72 | 7.03 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.22 | 114.19 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers