Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMIX vs RNWBX
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMIX vs RNWBX
Causeway Emerging Markets Instl
Price$14.28
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CEMIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMIX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CEMIX (2.95B). CEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMIX (2.84) vs RNWBX (0.12). CEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMIX (19 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMIX (1.14). CEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMIX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMIX (1000000). CEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.82 vs. RNWBX (18.68). CEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. RNWBX (7.66).
| CEMIX | RNWBX | CEMIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.250 | 20.612 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 75.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 0.12 | 2,410% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.82 | 18.68 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.44 | 40.84 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | 7.66 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.93 | 83.29 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers