Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWFX
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$15.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CEMGX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CEMGX (1.57B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMGX (1.34) vs RNWFX (0.95). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.34 vs. RNWFX (20.19). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 65.29 vs. RNWFX (19.35).
| CEMGX | RNWFX | CEMGX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.62 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.62 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.936 | 25.964 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.95 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.34 | 20.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.17 | 43.87 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.29 | 19.35 | 337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.04 | 96.17 | 124% |