Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWFX
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CEMFX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CEMFX (1.57B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMFX (1.89) vs RNWFX (0.95). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. RNWFX (20.14). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 73.75 vs. RNWFX (18.88).
| CEMFX | RNWFX | CEMFX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.119 | 26.728 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 0.95 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 20.14 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.32 | 44.75 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.75 | 18.88 | 391% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.01 | 97.36 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers