Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMFX vs RNWBX
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$18.54
Change+$2.66 (+16.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEMFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEMFX (1.82B). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMFX (1.65) vs RNWBX (0.45). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMFX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMFX (1.22). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.79 vs. RNWBX (26.27). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.00 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| CEMFX | RNWBX | CEMFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.66 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.163 | 5.996 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.45 | 366% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.79 | 26.27 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.11 | 38.81 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.00 | 7.03 | 1,266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.00 | 114.19 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement