Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$16.09
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.86
Change-$1.27 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. CEMDX (1.57B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (1.72) vs RNWFX (0.95). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.22 vs. RNWFX (21.74). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.30 vs. RNWFX (26.64).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.228 | 28.307 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 76.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.95 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.22 | 21.74 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.27 | 50.49 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.30 | 26.64 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.20 | 103.29 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement