Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$15.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds New World R5
Price$96.16
Change-$0.10 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. CEMDX (1.48B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (1.78) vs RNWFX (0.97). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.18 vs. RNWFX (15.54). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 91.54 vs. RNWFX (29.72).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.521 | 24.463 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 74.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.97 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.18 | 15.54 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.11 | 57.71 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.54 | 29.72 | 308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.45 | 94.93 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement