Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$15.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CEMDX (1.57B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (1.75) vs RNWFX (0.95). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMDX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.18 vs. RNWFX (20.19). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.52 vs. RNWFX (19.35).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.738 | 25.964 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 0.95 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.18 | 20.19 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.00 | 43.87 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.52 | 19.35 | 370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.90 | 96.17 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement