Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWFX
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$18.37
Change+$2.66 (+16.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEMDX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEMDX (1.82B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEMDX (1.39) vs RNWFX (1.31). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWFX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.53 vs. RNWFX (27.90). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 86.79 vs. RNWFX (12.39).
| CEMDX | RNWFX | CEMDX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.62 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.170 | 6.094 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.31 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.53 | 27.90 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.72 | 43.85 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.79 | 12.39 | 700% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.64 | 127.30 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement