Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWBX
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$18.37
Change+$2.66 (+16.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEMDX (1.82B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMDX (1.39) vs RNWBX (0.45). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEMDX (1.46). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.53 vs. RNWBX (26.27). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 86.79 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| CEMDX | RNWBX | CEMDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.66 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.170 | 5.996 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.45 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.53 | 26.27 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.72 | 38.81 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.79 | 7.03 | 1,234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.64 | 114.19 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement