Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs FNWFX
CEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs FNWFX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$18.37
Change+$2.66 (+16.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
American Funds New World F3
Price$98.93
Change+$2.47 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEMDX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. FNWFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Buy and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEMDX (1.82B). CEMDX (1.39) and FNWFX (1.36) have matching dividends . CEMDX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: CEMDX (13 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). CEMDX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). CEMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: CEMDX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.53 vs. FNWFX (27.96). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 86.79 vs. FNWFX (12.58).
| CEMDX | FNWFX | CEMDX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.57 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.57 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.170 | 6.114 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.36 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.53 | 27.96 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.72 | 44.04 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.79 | 12.58 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement