CELV
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.07 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.56M
YMZBY
Price
$180.00
Change
+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELV vs YMZBY

Header iconCELV vs YMZBY Comparison
Open Charts CELV vs YMZBYBanner chart's image
Preferred Commerce
Price$0.35
Change+$0.07 (+25.00%)
Volume$60.47K
Capitalization10.56M
Yamazaki Baking
Price$180.00
Change+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Volume$3
Capitalization3.81B
CELV vs YMZBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELV vs. YMZBY commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELV is a Hold and YMZBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CELV: $0.35 vs. YMZBY: $180.00)
Brand notoriety: CELV and YMZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELV: 325% vs. YMZBY: 180%
Market capitalization -- CELV: $10.56M vs. YMZBY: $3.81B
CELV [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $10.56M. YMZBY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YMZBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YMZBY is a better buy in the long-term than CELV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMZBY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • YMZBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELV is a better buy in the short-term than YMZBY.

Price Growth

CELV (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +11.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+11.17% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YMZBY($3.81B) has a higher market cap than CELV($10.6M). YMZBY YTD gains are higher at: 17.840 vs. CELV (-88.333). YMZBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 549M vs. CELV (69.5K). YMZBY has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. CELV (2.7K). CELV has less debt than YMZBY: CELV (4.77M) vs YMZBY (848M). YMZBY has higher revenues than CELV: YMZBY (9.57B) vs CELV (614K).
CELVYMZBYCELV / YMZBY
Capitalization10.6M3.81B0%
EBITDA69.5K549M0%
Gain YTD-88.33317.840-495%
P/E RatioN/A44.26-
Revenue614K9.57B0%
Total Cash2.7K1.25B0%
Total Debt4.77M848M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELV vs YMZBY: Fundamental Ratings
CELV
YMZBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9797
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YMZBY's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (67). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (97). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CELV (100). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew significantly faster than CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (47). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELV (100). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELVYMZBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVXY44.010.33
+0.76%
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures
SPTE31.780.14
+0.44%
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
DARP36.93-0.04
-0.12%
Grizzle Growth ETF
ELM25.98-0.12
-0.48%
Elm Market Navigator ETF
DFEV30.48-0.16
-0.52%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF

CELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELV and ORKLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELV and ORKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELV
1D Price
Change %
CELV100%
+25.87%
ORKLF - CELV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYCBF - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCC - CELV
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.95%
WEST - CELV
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.83%
More

YMZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YMZBY
1D Price
Change %
YMZBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - YMZBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELV - YMZBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+25.87%
RRSFF - YMZBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More