CELV
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
26.24M
YMZBY
Price
$180.00
Change
+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.63B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELV vs YMZBY

Header iconCELV vs YMZBY Comparison
Open Charts CELV vs YMZBYBanner chart's image
Preferred Commerce
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$2.05K
Capitalization26.24M
Yamazaki Baking
Price$180.00
Change+$27.25 (+17.84%)
Volume$3
Capitalization4.63B
CELV vs YMZBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELV vs. YMZBY commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELV is a Buy and YMZBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CELV: $0.21 vs. YMZBY: $180.00)
Brand notoriety: CELV and YMZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELV: 6% vs. YMZBY: 103%
Market capitalization -- CELV: $26.24M vs. YMZBY: $4.63B
CELV [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $26.24M. YMZBY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $4.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $240.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YMZBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YMZBY is a better buy in the long-term than CELV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMZBY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • YMZBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELV is a better buy in the short-term than YMZBY.

Price Growth

CELV (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.90% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +640.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.24% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YMZBY($4.63B) has a higher market cap than CELV($26.2M). YMZBY YTD gains are higher at: 17.840 vs. CELV (-93.033). YMZBY has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. CELV (88.1K). CELV has less debt than YMZBY: CELV (1.57M) vs YMZBY (102B).
CELVYMZBYCELV / YMZBY
Capitalization26.2M4.63B1%
EBITDAN/A102B-
Gain YTD-93.03317.840-521%
P/E RatioN/A14.03-
RevenueN/A1.28T-
Total Cash88.1K173B0%
Total Debt1.57M102B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELV vs YMZBY: Fundamental Ratings
CELV
YMZBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9897
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10074
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YMZBY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (63). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (98). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (100). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (65). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

YMZBY's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CELV (100). This means that YMZBY’s stock grew similarly to CELV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELVYMZBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YMZBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZZZ29.70N/A
N/A
CYBER HORNET S&P500 Bitcoin 75/25StgyETF
PUTW30.15N/A
N/A
WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund
CPRA25.92-0.03
-0.10%
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Apr
CONY6.85-0.01
-0.15%
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
PRAY31.20-0.19
-0.59%
FIS Christian Stock ETF

CELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELV and ORKLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELV and ORKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELV
1D Price
Change %
CELV100%
+5.08%
ORKLF - CELV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYCBF - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.25%
YMZBY - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCC - CELV
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEST - CELV
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More

YMZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YMZBY
1D Price
Change %
YMZBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - YMZBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELV - YMZBY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRSFF - YMZBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More