CELV
Price
$3.10
Change
-$0.05 (-1.59%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.56M
MNDDF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
Ad is loading...

CELV vs MNDDF

Header iconCELV vs MNDDF Comparison
Open Charts CELV vs MNDDFBanner chart's image
Preferred Commerce
Price$3.10
Change-$0.05 (-1.59%)
Volume$1.29K
Capitalization10.56M
Monde Nissin
Price$0.23
Change+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.7B
CELV vs MNDDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELV vs. MNDDF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELV is a Hold and MNDDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CELV: $3.10 vs. MNDDF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CELV and MNDDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELV: 7% vs. MNDDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CELV: $10.56M vs. MNDDF: $2.7B
CELV [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $10.56M. MNDDF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNDDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNDDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELV is a better buy in the long-term than MNDDF.

Price Growth

CELV (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +3.33% price change this week, while MNDDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.71% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNDDF($2.7B) has a higher market cap than CELV($10.6M). CELV YTD gains are higher at: 3.333 vs. MNDDF (0.000). CELV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 69.5K vs. MNDDF (-9.3B). MNDDF has more cash in the bank: 13.5B vs. CELV (2.7K). CELV has less debt than MNDDF: CELV (4.77M) vs MNDDF (11.1B). MNDDF has higher revenues than CELV: MNDDF (75.6B) vs CELV (614K).
CELVMNDDFCELV / MNDDF
Capitalization10.6M2.7B0%
EBITDA69.5K-9.3B-0%
Gain YTD3.3330.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue614K75.6B0%
Total Cash2.7K13.5B0%
Total Debt4.77M11.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELV: Fundamental Ratings
CELV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

CELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELV and ORKLF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELV and ORKLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELV
1D Price
Change %
CELV100%
N/A
ORKLF - CELV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYCBF - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCNF - CELV
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
NGRBF - CELV
2%
Poorly correlated
+8.30%
More

MNDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNDDF has been closely correlated with GWLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MNDDF jumps, then GWLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNDDF
1D Price
Change %
MNDDF100%
N/A
GWLL - MNDDF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
KRYAF - MNDDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CULTF - MNDDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.30%
BRCNF - MNDDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
CELV - MNDDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More