CELJF
Price
$12.10
Change
+$1.33 (+12.35%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VZ
Price
$47.22
Change
+$0.97 (+2.10%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
195.04B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs VZ

Header iconCELJF vs VZ Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs VZBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$12.10
Change+$1.33 (+12.35%)
Volume$314
Capitalization2.04B
Verizon Communications
Price$47.22
Change+$0.97 (+2.10%)
Volume$15.9K
Capitalization195.04B
CELJF vs VZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. VZ commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a StrongBuy and VZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CELJF: $12.10 vs. VZ: $46.25)
Brand notoriety: CELJF: Not notable vs. VZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 20% vs. VZ: 200%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $2.04B vs. VZ: $195.04B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.04B. VZ’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $195.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $221.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVZ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, VZ is a better buy in the long-term than CELJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • VZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELJF is a better buy in the short-term than VZ.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +6.98% price change this week, while VZ (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +17.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

VZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.08% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VZ($195B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($2.04B). CELJF has higher P/E ratio than VZ: CELJF (24.53) vs VZ (11.39). VZ YTD gains are higher at: 15.523 vs. CELJF (13.606). VZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.1B vs. CELJF (1.42B). CELJF has less debt than VZ: CELJF (2.21B) vs VZ (170B). VZ has higher revenues than CELJF: VZ (137B) vs CELJF (4.29B).
CELJFVZCELJF / VZ
Capitalization2.04B195B1%
EBITDA1.42B51.1B3%
Gain YTD13.60615.52388%
P/E Ratio24.5311.39215%
Revenue4.29B137B3%
Total Cash149MN/A-
Total Debt2.21B170B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs VZ: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
VZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2520
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2786
SMR RATING
1..100
7046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4218
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4733
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VZ's Valuation (17) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (56) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VZ (86) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VZ’s over the last 12 months.

VZ's SMR Rating (46) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

VZ's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (42) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

VZ's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (47) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBET35.820.76
+2.17%
Neuberger Berman Engy Trnstn & InfrasETF
PVI24.880.07
+0.26%
Invesco Floating Rate MunicipalIncomeETF
CZA114.800.15
+0.13%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
IEF95.530.09
+0.09%
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
XEMD44.80-0.04
-0.09%
BondBloxx JP Morgan USD EM 1-10 Yr BdETF

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and ATNI have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and ATNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
+6.88%
ATNI - CELJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
T - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
CHT - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
VZ - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
RCI - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
More

VZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VZ has been closely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VZ jumps, then T could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VZ
1D Price
Change %
VZ100%
+3.68%
T - VZ
73%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
TMUS - VZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
VOD - VZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
BCE - VZ
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
TU - VZ
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More