It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVOD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VOD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while VOD (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +4.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.65%.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
CELJF | VOD | CELJF / VOD | |
Capitalization | 1.47B | 27.9B | 5% |
EBITDA | 1.38B | 11.6B | 12% |
Gain YTD | 53.775 | 39.016 | 138% |
P/E Ratio | 21.51 | 9.87 | 218% |
Revenue | 4.42B | 37.4B | 12% |
Total Cash | 211M | 15.5B | 1% |
Total Debt | 2.45B | 53.1B | 5% |
CELJF | VOD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VOD's Valuation (30) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (92). This means that VOD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VOD (92). This means that CELJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VOD’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's SMR Rating (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as VOD (100). This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to VOD’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as VOD (42). This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to VOD’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for VOD (94). This means that CELJF’s stock grew significantly faster than VOD’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF | VOD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% | 3 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago67% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago72% | 14 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago41% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TOTR | 40.59 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | |||
DHDG | 32.21 | -0.04 | -0.12% |
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt 2.5 to 15 Buffr ETF | |||
DFAE | 29.68 | -0.07 | -0.24% |
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF | |||
IBUY | 70.94 | -0.57 | -0.80% |
Amplify Online Retail ETF | |||
EFNL | 41.17 | -0.36 | -0.86% |
iShares MSCI Finland ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CELJF | 100% | N/A | ||
VOD - CELJF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
VZ - CELJF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
CHT - CELJF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
T - CELJF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
CMCSA - CELJF | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOD has been loosely correlated with TEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VOD jumps, then TEF could also see price increases.