CELJF
Price
$10.51
Change
-$1.59 (-13.14%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.95B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
T
Price
$25.75
Change
+$0.10 (+0.39%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
182.55B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs T

Header iconCELJF vs T Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs TBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$10.51
Change-$1.59 (-13.14%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization1.95B
AT&T
Price$25.75
Change+$0.10 (+0.39%)
Volume$49.79M
Capitalization182.55B
CELJF vs T Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. T commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Hold and T is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CELJF: $10.51 vs. T: $25.75)
Brand notoriety: CELJF: Not notable vs. T: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 90% vs. T: 97%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $1.95B vs. T: $182.55B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.95B. T’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $182.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $240B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • T’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELJF is a better buy in the long-term than T.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while T’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • T’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, T is a better buy in the short-term than CELJF.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while T (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

T is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.29% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
T($183B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($1.95B). CELJF has higher P/E ratio than T: CELJF (24.02) vs T (8.39). CELJF YTD gains are higher at: 93.554 vs. T (17.685). T has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.4B vs. CELJF (1.39B). T has more cash in the bank: 4.55B vs. CELJF (305M). CELJF has less debt than T: CELJF (2.45B) vs T (150B). T has higher revenues than CELJF: T (124B) vs CELJF (4.37B).
CELJFTCELJF / T
Capitalization1.95B183B1%
EBITDA1.39B46.4B3%
Gain YTD93.55417.685529%
P/E Ratio24.028.39286%
Revenue4.37B124B4%
Total Cash305M4.55B7%
Total Debt2.45B150B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs T: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
T
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2928
SMR RATING
1..100
7262
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2395
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
66

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

T's Valuation (35) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (93) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

T's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (29) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

T's SMR Rating (62) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as T (59) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to T’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for T (95) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew significantly faster than T’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
T
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPND37.080.19
+0.50%
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
JEPQ58.750.03
+0.05%
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Inc ETF
JCPI48.61-0.06
-0.12%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
ZTOP52.15-0.12
-0.23%
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
XTL144.91-0.38
-0.26%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Telecom ETF

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and ATNI have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and ATNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
-13.14%
ATNI - CELJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
T - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CHT - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
VZ - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
RCI - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

T and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, T has been closely correlated with VZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if T jumps, then VZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To T
1D Price
Change %
T100%
+1.87%
VZ - T
76%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
TMUS - T
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
VOD - T
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
CMCSA - T
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
TIMB - T
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More