Advertisement
CELJF vs T
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Buy and T is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CELJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- T’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while T’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- T’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while T (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
T is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.88% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CELJF | T | CELJF / T | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 203B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 1.38B | 46.4B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 53.775 | 27.737 | 194% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.51 | 16.23 | 133% |
| Revenue | 4.42B | 124B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 211M | 10.5B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 2.45B | 150B | 2% |
CELJF | T | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
T's Valuation (40) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (92) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
T's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
T's SMR Rating (62) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
T's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
T's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (27) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that T’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
| CELJF | T | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 72% | 16 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
CELJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VOD - CELJF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| VZ - CELJF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CHT - CELJF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| T - CELJF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CMCSA - CELJF | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
T and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, T has been closely correlated with VZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if T jumps, then VZ could also see price increases.