CELJF
Price
$10.20
Change
-$0.23 (-2.21%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
25 days until earnings call
RCI
Price
$37.25
Change
+$0.06 (+0.16%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.19B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs RCI

Header iconCELJF vs RCI Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs RCIBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$10.20
Change-$0.23 (-2.21%)
Volume$918
Capitalization1.72B
Rogers Communications
Price$37.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
Volume$1.29M
Capitalization20.19B
CELJF vs RCI Comparison Chart in %
CELJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. RCI commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a StrongBuy and RCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CELJF: $10.20 vs. RCI: $37.25)
Brand notoriety: CELJF and RCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 50% vs. RCI: 132%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $1.72B vs. RCI: $20.19B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.72B. RCI’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $20.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRCI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RCI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCI is a better buy in the long-term than CELJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCI is a better buy in the short-term than CELJF.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -5.29% price change this week, while RCI (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

RCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCI($20.2B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($1.72B). CELJF has higher P/E ratio than RCI: CELJF (23.77) vs RCI (18.75). CELJF YTD gains are higher at: 87.845 vs. RCI (21.217). RCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.01B vs. CELJF (1.39B). RCI has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. CELJF (305M). CELJF has less debt than RCI: CELJF (2.45B) vs RCI (45.4B). RCI has higher revenues than CELJF: RCI (20.8B) vs CELJF (4.37B).
CELJFRCICELJF / RCI
Capitalization1.72B20.2B9%
EBITDA1.39B9.01B15%
Gain YTD87.84521.217414%
P/E Ratio23.7718.75127%
Revenue4.37B20.8B21%
Total Cash305M6.96B4%
Total Debt2.45B45.4B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs RCI: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
RCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9797
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2541
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCI's Valuation (41) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (92). This means that RCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCI (100). This means that CELJF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCI’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's SMR Rating (100) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RCI (100). This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to RCI’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Price Growth Rating (97) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RCI (97). This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to RCI’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as RCI (41). This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to RCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFRCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSMJ31.490.13
+0.43%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
EVT24.260.05
+0.21%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
MLPD24.720.03
+0.12%
Global X MLP & Engy Infras Cov Cll ETF
ARKA68.32N/A
N/A
ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Futures Strategy ETF
PDN40.90-0.02
-0.05%
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and ATNI have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and ATNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
N/A
ATNI - CELJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
T - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
CHT - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
VZ - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
RCI - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More

RCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCI has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCI jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCI
1D Price
Change %
RCI100%
+0.16%
BCE - RCI
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
DTEGY - RCI
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
TU - RCI
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
TLSNY - RCI
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
SGAPY - RCI
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More