Advertisement
CELJF vs CMCSA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Buy and CMCSA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CELJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMCSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CELJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CMCSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CELJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMCSA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CELJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CMCSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while CMCSA (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -3.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMCSA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.88% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CELJF | CMCSA | CELJF / CMCSA | |
| Capitalization | 1.47B | 122B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 1.38B | 47.5B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 53.775 | -14.057 | -383% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.51 | 5.46 | 394% |
| Revenue | 4.42B | 124B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 211M | 9.69B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 2.45B | 102B | 2% |
CELJF | CMCSA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMCSA's Valuation (44) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (92) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMCSA (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
CMCSA's SMR Rating (38) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CMCSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CMCSA (63) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCSA (94) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCSA’s over the last 12 months.
| CELJF | CMCSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 67% | 22 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSW.X | 0.026486 | 0.000663 | +2.57% |
| Biswap cryptocurrency | |||
| AGIX.X | 0.300011 | -0.009744 | -3.15% |
| SingularityNET cryptocurrency | |||
| ENS.X | 27.972628 | -1.531229 | -5.19% |
| Ethereum Name Service cryptocurrency | |||
| DGB.X | 0.008742 | -0.000549 | -5.91% |
| DigiByte cryptocurrency | |||
| VANRY.X | 0.030997 | -0.002702 | -8.02% |
| Vanar Chain cryptocurrency | |||
CELJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CELJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| VOD - CELJF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| VZ - CELJF | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CHT - CELJF | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| T - CELJF | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CMCSA - CELJF | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
CMCSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCSA has been loosely correlated with CHTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMCSA jumps, then CHTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMCSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSA | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| CHTR - CMCSA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| LBRDA - CMCSA | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| LBRDK - CMCSA | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ATUS - CMCSA | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.65% | ||
| WOW - CMCSA | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.96% | ||
More | ||||