CELJF
Price
$9.06
Change
-$0.07 (-0.77%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
46 days until earnings call
CHT
Price
$43.74
Change
+$0.14 (+0.32%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.33B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs CHT

Header iconCELJF vs CHT Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs CHTBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$9.06
Change-$0.07 (-0.77%)
Volume$327
Capitalization1.53B
CHUNGHWA TELECOM
Price$43.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.32%)
Volume$5.88K
Capitalization34.33B
CELJF vs CHT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. CHT commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Hold and CHT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CELJF: $9.06 vs. CHT: $43.74)
Brand notoriety: CELJF and CHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 23% vs. CHT: 37%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $1.53B vs. CHT: $34.07B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.53B. CHT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $34.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELJF is a better buy in the long-term than CHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the short-term than CELJF.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while CHT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

CHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.42% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHT($34.3B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($1.53B). CHT has higher P/E ratio than CELJF: CHT (27.26) vs CELJF (21.58). CELJF YTD gains are higher at: 66.897 vs. CHT (20.459). CHT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.6B vs. CELJF (1.39B). CHT has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. CELJF (305M). CELJF has less debt than CHT: CELJF (2.45B) vs CHT (43.6B). CHT has higher revenues than CELJF: CHT (232B) vs CELJF (4.37B).
CELJFCHTCELJF / CHT
Capitalization1.53B34.3B4%
EBITDA1.39B89.6B2%
Gain YTD66.89720.459327%
P/E Ratio21.5827.2679%
Revenue4.37B232B2%
Total Cash305M73.9B0%
Total Debt2.45B43.6B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs CHT: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
CHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3541
SMR RATING
1..100
7269
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHT's Valuation (51) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (92) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (41) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's SMR Rating (69) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (54) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (46) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
28%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
26%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCDL19.461.54
+8.57%
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF
SDVD21.690.28
+1.31%
FT Vest SMID Ris Div Ach Trg IncETF
IBUY76.640.70
+0.92%
Amplify Online Retail ETF
SPTI28.84N/A
-0.02%
SPDR® Portfolio Intmdt Term Trs ETF
EMSF28.65-0.34
-1.18%
Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
N/A
VOD - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
VZ - CELJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
CHT - CELJF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
T - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
CMCSA - CELJF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More

CHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHT
1D Price
Change %
CHT100%
+0.32%
SKM - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
KT - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
VOD - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
BCE - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
TLK - CHT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
More