CELJF
Price
$10.51
Change
-$1.59 (-13.14%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.95B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CHT
Price
$42.41
Change
-$0.34 (-0.80%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
32.91B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs CHT

Header iconCELJF vs CHT Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs CHTBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$10.51
Change-$1.59 (-13.14%)
Volume$1.47K
Capitalization1.95B
CHUNGHWA TELECOM
Price$42.41
Change-$0.34 (-0.80%)
Volume$177.64K
Capitalization32.91B
CELJF vs CHT Comparison Chart in %
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. CHT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Hold and CHT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CELJF: $10.51 vs. CHT: $42.41)
Brand notoriety: CELJF and CHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 90% vs. CHT: 132%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $1.95B vs. CHT: $32.91B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.95B. CHT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $32.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $240B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the long-term than CELJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the short-term than CELJF.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while CHT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

CHT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.60% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHT($32.9B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($1.95B). CHT has higher P/E ratio than CELJF: CHT (26.75) vs CELJF (24.02). CELJF YTD gains are higher at: 93.554 vs. CHT (16.796). CHT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.6B vs. CELJF (1.39B). CHT has more cash in the bank: 73.9B vs. CELJF (305M). CELJF has less debt than CHT: CELJF (2.45B) vs CHT (43.6B). CHT has higher revenues than CELJF: CHT (232B) vs CELJF (4.37B).
CELJFCHTCELJF / CHT
Capitalization1.95B32.9B6%
EBITDA1.39B89.6B2%
Gain YTD93.55416.796557%
P/E Ratio24.0226.7590%
Revenue4.37B232B2%
Total Cash305M73.9B0%
Total Debt2.45B43.6B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs CHT: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
CHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2945
SMR RATING
1..100
7268
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
665

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHT's Valuation (50) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELJF (93) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (45) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's SMR Rating (68) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (72) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (56) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (38) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
26%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DON51.01-0.40
-0.78%
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF
ISD14.39-0.18
-1.24%
PGIM High Yield
GMOM32.79-0.51
-1.52%
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
CHPS44.44-1.46
-3.17%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
PANG15.63-0.84
-5.07%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and ATNI have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and ATNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
-13.14%
ATNI - CELJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
T - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CHT - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
VZ - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
RCI - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More

CHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with KT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then KT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHT
1D Price
Change %
CHT100%
-0.80%
KT - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
SKM - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
DTEGY - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
TLK - CHT
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
VOD - CHT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More