CELJF
Price
$10.45
Change
-$1.03 (-8.97%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.85B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CHT
Price
$41.61
Change
+$0.29 (+0.70%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
32.36B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELJF vs CHT

Header iconCELJF vs CHT Comparison
Open Charts CELJF vs CHTBanner chart's image
Cellcom Israel
Price$10.45
Change-$1.03 (-8.97%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.85B
CHUNGHWA TELECOM
Price$41.61
Change+$0.29 (+0.70%)
Volume$119.92K
Capitalization32.36B
CELJF vs CHT Comparison Chart in %
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELJF vs. CHT commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELJF is a Hold and CHT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CELJF: $10.45 vs. CHT: $41.61)
Brand notoriety: CELJF and CHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELJF: 20% vs. CHT: 74%
Market capitalization -- CELJF: $1.85B vs. CHT: $32.36B
CELJF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.85B. CHT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $32.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $224.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $17.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELJF is a better buy in the long-term than CHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CHT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHT is a better buy in the short-term than CELJF.

Price Growth

CELJF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -12.15% price change this week, while CHT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELJF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

CHT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.63% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHT($32.4B) has a higher market cap than CELJF($1.85B). CHT has higher P/E ratio than CELJF: CHT (26.60) vs CELJF (21.78). CELJF YTD gains are higher at: 92.530 vs. CHT (14.593). CHT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90.5B vs. CELJF (1.42B). CHT has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CELJF (149M). CELJF has less debt than CHT: CELJF (2.21B) vs CHT (38.6B). CHT has higher revenues than CELJF: CHT (234B) vs CELJF (4.29B).
CELJFCHTCELJF / CHT
Capitalization1.85B32.4B6%
EBITDA1.42B90.5B2%
Gain YTD92.53014.593634%
P/E Ratio21.7826.6082%
Revenue4.29B234B2%
Total Cash149M40.1B0%
Total Debt2.21B38.6B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELJF vs CHT: Fundamental Ratings
CELJF
CHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6913
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3351
SMR RATING
1..100
7170
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHT's Valuation (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (53) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (51) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's SMR Rating (70) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (71) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

CELJF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CHT (59) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that CELJF’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.

CHT's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CELJF (50) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to CELJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELJFCHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGI16.540.01
+0.06%
Western Asset Investment Grade Opportunity Trust Inc
OAKM28.630.01
+0.03%
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
HYEM20.00-0.03
-0.15%
VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF
DNP10.04-0.03
-0.30%
DNP Select Income Fund
EUM20.05-0.12
-0.60%
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets

CELJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELJF and ATNI have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELJF and ATNI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELJF
1D Price
Change %
CELJF100%
-8.96%
ATNI - CELJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
T - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
CHT - CELJF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
VZ - CELJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
RCI - CELJF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More

CHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with KT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then KT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHT
1D Price
Change %
CHT100%
+0.70%
KT - CHT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
SKM - CHT
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
DTEGY - CHT
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
VOD - CHT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
IQST - CHT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More