CELH
Price
$53.13
Change
+$0.52 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
13.7B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRMB
Price
$18.33
Change
+$0.18 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.7B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs PRMB

Header iconCELH vs PRMB Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs PRMBBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$53.13
Change+$0.52 (+0.99%)
Volume$4.08M
Capitalization13.7B
Primo Brands
Price$18.33
Change+$0.18 (+0.99%)
Volume$126.23K
Capitalization6.7B
CELH vs PRMB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. PRMB commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a Hold and PRMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CELH: $53.13 vs. PRMB: $18.32)
Brand notoriety: CELH and PRMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 71% vs. PRMB: 117%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $13.7B vs. PRMB: $6.7B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $13.7B. PRMB’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $6.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $307.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CELH and PRMB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than PRMB.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.49% price change this week, while PRMB (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +7.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

PRMB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.67% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($13.7B) has a higher market cap than PRMB($6.7B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than PRMB: CELH (442.75) vs PRMB (88.04). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 16.157 vs. PRMB (11.009). PRMB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 875M vs. CELH (112M). CELH has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. PRMB (422M). CELH has less debt than PRMB: CELH (861M) vs PRMB (5.7B). PRMB has higher revenues than CELH: PRMB (6.51B) vs CELH (2.13B).
CELHPRMBCELH / PRMB
Capitalization13.7B6.7B205%
EBITDA112M875M13%
Gain YTD16.15711.009147%
P/E Ratio442.7588.04503%
Revenue2.13B6.51B33%
Total Cash806M422M191%
Total Debt861M5.7B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHPRMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTWG252.301.26
+0.50%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
JSML77.12-0.21
-0.27%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Gr Alpha ETF
JPMO15.17-0.15
-0.97%
YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF
GFLW28.60-0.31
-1.07%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
NVOX28.94-0.73
-2.46%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with PRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then PRMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+0.99%
PRMB - CELH
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
STKL - CELH
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
MNST - CELH
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
KDP - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
FIZZ - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

PRMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRMB has been loosely correlated with CELH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRMB jumps, then CELH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRMB
1D Price
Change %
PRMB100%
+0.06%
CELH - PRMB
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
STKL - PRMB
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.40%
KDP - PRMB
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
COCO - PRMB
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
BRFH - PRMB
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More