CELH
Price
$54.20
Change
+$2.39 (+4.61%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.35B
40 days until earnings call
MNST
Price
$64.59
Change
-$0.34 (-0.52%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
63.07B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs MNST

Header iconCELH vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs MNSTBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$54.20
Change+$2.39 (+4.61%)
Volume$1.56K
Capitalization13.35B
Monster Beverage
Price$64.59
Change-$0.34 (-0.52%)
Volume$3.13M
Capitalization63.07B
CELH vs MNST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. MNST commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a StrongBuy and MNST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $51.81 vs. MNST: $64.59)
Brand notoriety: CELH and MNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 75% vs. MNST: 55%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $13.35B vs. MNST: $63.07B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $13.35B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $63.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $283.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than MNST.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -6.13% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.13% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($63.1B) has a higher market cap than CELH($13.4B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than MNST: CELH (136.33) vs MNST (40.12). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 96.678 vs. MNST (22.869). MNST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.16B vs. CELH (184M). MNST has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CELH (615M). MNST has less debt than CELH: MNST (199M) vs CELH (863M). MNST has higher revenues than CELH: MNST (7.66B) vs CELH (1.67B).
CELHMNSTCELH / MNST
Capitalization13.4B63.1B21%
EBITDA184M2.16B9%
Gain YTD96.67822.869423%
P/E Ratio136.3340.12340%
Revenue1.67B7.66B22%
Total Cash615M2.07B30%
Total Debt863M199M434%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs MNST: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5372
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6132
SMR RATING
1..100
6640
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4532
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CELH's Valuation (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (92). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (61). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (40) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (66). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (45). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (24). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSPX30.48N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Sustainable Eq ETF
AGZD22.41N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
EFR11.53-0.01
-0.09%
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund
KJUN27.15-0.07
-0.27%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Jun
HDEF28.97-0.08
-0.28%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Div Yld Eq ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
-0.14%
MNST - CELH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
PEP - CELH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
KO - CELH
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
KDP - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CCEP - CELH
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
-0.54%
PEP - MNST
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
KDP - MNST
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
CCEP - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
KO - MNST
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CELH - MNST
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More