CELH
Price
$54.20
Change
+$2.39 (+4.61%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.35B
40 days until earnings call
KO
Price
$65.53
Change
-$0.45 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
283.96B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs KO

Header iconCELH vs KO Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs KOBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$54.20
Change+$2.39 (+4.61%)
Volume$1.56K
Capitalization13.35B
Coca-Cola
Price$65.53
Change-$0.45 (-0.68%)
Volume$14.53K
Capitalization283.96B
CELH vs KO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. KO commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a StrongBuy and KO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $51.81 vs. KO: $65.98)
Brand notoriety: CELH: Not notable vs. KO: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 75% vs. KO: 94%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $13.35B vs. KO: $283.96B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $13.35B. KO’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $283.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $283.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KO is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than KO.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -6.13% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

KO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.14% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KO($284B) has a higher market cap than CELH($13.4B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than KO: CELH (136.33) vs KO (23.40). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 96.678 vs. KO (8.341). CELH has less debt than KO: CELH (863M) vs KO (49.4B).
CELHKOCELH / KO
Capitalization13.4B284B5%
EBITDA184MN/A-
Gain YTD96.6788.3411,159%
P/E Ratio136.3323.40583%
Revenue1.67BN/A-
Total Cash615MN/A-
Total Debt863M49.4B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs KO: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
KO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5355
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6119
SMR RATING
1..100
6621
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
372
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KO's Valuation (33) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (92). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (61). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

KO's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CELH (66). This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as KO (61). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for KO (72). This means that CELH’s stock grew significantly faster than KO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHKO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSPX30.48N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Sustainable Eq ETF
AGZD22.41N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
EFR11.53-0.01
-0.09%
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund
KJUN27.15-0.07
-0.27%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Jun
HDEF28.97-0.08
-0.28%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Div Yld Eq ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
-0.14%
MNST - CELH
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
PEP - CELH
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
KO - CELH
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
KDP - CELH
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
CCEP - CELH
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More

KO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KO has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KO jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KO
1D Price
Change %
KO100%
-0.71%
PEP - KO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
KDP - KO
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
CCEP - KO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
MNST - KO
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
FIZZ - KO
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More