CELH
Price
$53.13
Change
+$0.52 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
13.7B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COCO
Price
$51.99
Change
-$3.29 (-5.95%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.96B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs COCO

Header iconCELH vs COCO Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs COCOBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$53.13
Change+$0.52 (+0.99%)
Volume$4.08M
Capitalization13.7B
Vita Coco Company (The)
Price$51.99
Change-$3.29 (-5.95%)
Volume$808.16K
Capitalization2.96B
CELH vs COCO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. COCO commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELH is a Hold and COCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CELH: $53.13 vs. COCO: $51.99)
Brand notoriety: CELH and COCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 71% vs. COCO: 109%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $13.7B vs. COCO: $2.96B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $13.7B. COCO’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $2.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $307.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $23.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCOCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • COCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COCO is a better buy in the long-term than CELH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COCO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • COCO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than COCO.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.49% price change this week, while COCO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

COCO is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+3.03% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELH($13.7B) has a higher market cap than COCO($2.96B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than COCO: CELH (442.75) vs COCO (45.21). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 16.157 vs. COCO (-1.924). CELH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 112M vs. COCO (74.4M). CELH has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. COCO (204M). COCO has less debt than CELH: COCO (14M) vs CELH (861M). CELH has higher revenues than COCO: CELH (2.13B) vs COCO (609M).
CELHCOCOCELH / COCO
Capitalization13.7B2.96B463%
EBITDA112M74.4M151%
Gain YTD16.157-1.924-840%
P/E Ratio442.7545.21979%
Revenue2.13B609M349%
Total Cash806M204M395%
Total Debt861M14M6,150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHCOCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARFX23.810.15
+0.63%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Institutional
MYIMX25.100.15
+0.60%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value Y
ABPZX12.81-0.01
-0.08%
AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Port Z
RPMGX100.75-0.09
-0.09%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
JORRX19.54-0.03
-0.15%
Janus Henderson Global Select R

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CELH has been loosely correlated with PRMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CELH jumps, then PRMB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+0.99%
PRMB - CELH
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
STKL - CELH
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
MNST - CELH
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
KDP - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
FIZZ - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

COCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COCO and MNST have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COCO and MNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COCO
1D Price
Change %
COCO100%
-5.95%
MNST - COCO
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
FIZZ - COCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
COKE - COCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
PEP - COCO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
CELH - COCO
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More