Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWHX
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWHX
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
Price$18.42
Change+$1.26 (+7.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.62M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEKRX (810M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CEKRX: RNWHX (1.25) vs CEKRX (0.38). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEKRX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CEKRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.15 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. CEKRX (-8.38).
| CEKRX | RNWHX | CEKRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.72 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.72 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.964 | 6.092 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 75.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.25 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.15 | 27.68 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.01 | 43.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.38 | 11.69 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.47 | 124.21 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers