Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEKRX vs RNWHX
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEKRX vs RNWHX
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
Price$17.17
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets765.62M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
CEKRX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEKRX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEKRX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. CEKRX (766M). CEKRX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEKRX (1.05) vs RNWHX (0.90). CEKRX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEKRX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CEKRX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEKRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). CEKRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: CEKRX (0) vs RNWHX (250). CEKRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.98 vs. RNWHX (20.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. CEKRX (0.66).
| CEKRX | RNWHX | CEKRX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.72 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.098 | 26.572 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 766M | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.98 | 20.99 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.82 | 48.72 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.66 | 24.39 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement