CEIEF
Price
$0.63
Change
+$0.04 (+6.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
273.47M
WDS
Price
$15.78
Change
-$0.05 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
37.83B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEIEF vs WDS

Header iconCEIEF vs WDS Comparison
Open Charts CEIEF vs WDSBanner chart's image
COELACANTH ENERGY
Price$0.63
Change+$0.04 (+6.78%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization273.47M
Woodside Energy Group
Price$15.78
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
Volume$379.87K
Capitalization37.83B
CEIEF vs WDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEIEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEIEF vs. WDS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEIEF is a Hold and WDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CEIEF: $0.63 vs. WDS: $15.78)
Brand notoriety: CEIEF and WDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEIEF: 29% vs. WDS: 39%
Market capitalization -- CEIEF: $273.47M vs. WDS: $37.83B
CEIEF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $273.47M. WDS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $37.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEIEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEIEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDS is a better buy in the long-term than CEIEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEIEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEIEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEIEF is a better buy in the short-term than WDS.

Price Growth

CEIEF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while WDS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

WDS is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WDS($37.8B) has a higher market cap than CEIEF($273M). CEIEF YTD gains are higher at: 12.357 vs. WDS (4.836). WDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.67B vs. CEIEF (-9.63M). WDS has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. CEIEF (54M). CEIEF has less debt than WDS: CEIEF (1.53M) vs WDS (6.5B). WDS has higher revenues than CEIEF: WDS (14B) vs CEIEF (7.1M).
CEIEFWDSCEIEF / WDS
Capitalization273M37.8B1%
EBITDA-9.63M7.67B-0%
Gain YTD12.3574.836256%
P/E RatioN/A23.00-
Revenue7.1M14B0%
Total Cash54M1.95B3%
Total Debt1.53M6.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WDS: Fundamental Ratings
WDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEIEFWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEIEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGOSX27.590.33
+1.21%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R4
GSTIX14.450.17
+1.19%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Instl
FDSSX84.080.72
+0.86%
Fidelity Stock Selec
RYUIX62.450.51
+0.82%
Rydex Utilities Inv
RYPCX7.050.05
+0.71%
Royce Small-Cap Fund Consult

CEIEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEIEF and PSUD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEIEF and PSUD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEIEF
1D Price
Change %
CEIEF100%
N/A
PSUD - CEIEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.33%
PTHRF - CEIEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
WDS - CEIEF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
VTS - CEIEF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
GRNT - CEIEF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More

WDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDS has been closely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDS jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDS
1D Price
Change %
WDS100%
-0.32%
VET - WDS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
FANG - WDS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CNQ - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CHRD - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
HES - WDS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More