CEFC
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.50 (+4.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
47.58M
WTBFB
Price
$315.30
Change
-$1.43 (-0.45%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
795.19M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEFC vs WTBFB

Header iconCEFC vs WTBFB Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs WTBFBBanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$12.00
Change+$0.50 (+4.35%)
Volume$504
Capitalization47.58M
W.T.B. Financial
Price$315.30
Change-$1.43 (-0.45%)
Volume$75
Capitalization795.19M
CEFC vs WTBFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. WTBFB commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a Buy and WTBFB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CEFC: $12.00 vs. WTBFB: $315.30)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and WTBFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 14% vs. WTBFB: 5%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $47.58M vs. WTBFB: $795.19M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.58M. WTBFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $795.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WTBFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than WTBFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBFB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WTBFB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTBFB is a better buy in the short-term than CEFC.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while WTBFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBFB($795M) has a higher market cap than CEFC($47.6M). WTBFB has higher P/E ratio than CEFC: WTBFB (11.31) vs CEFC (8.11). CEFC YTD gains are higher at: 25.160 vs. WTBFB (3.599). WTBFB has more cash in the bank: 165M vs. CEFC (6.29M). CEFC has less debt than WTBFB: CEFC (39.8M) vs WTBFB (500M).
CEFCWTBFBCEFC / WTBFB
Capitalization47.6M795M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.1603.599699%
P/E Ratio8.1111.3172%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash6.29M165M4%
Total Debt39.8M500M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC vs WTBFB: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
WTBFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3661
SMR RATING
1..100
522
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEFC's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WTBFB (93). This means that CEFC’s stock grew significantly faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (61). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (22). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (51). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WTBFB (86). This means that CEFC’s stock grew significantly faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFCWTBFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
34%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PARNX62.140.88
+1.44%
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Investor
PYSVX18.000.09
+0.50%
Putnam Small Cap Value Y
SIIIX16.510.05
+0.30%
AlphaCentric Real Income I
PEGCX20.320.05
+0.25%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth C
IEIFX11.11-0.02
-0.18%
Invesco Equity and Income R6

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and HFBL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and HFBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
+4.35%
HFBL - CEFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
BAP - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
WTBFB - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

WTBFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBFB has been loosely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBFB jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBFB
1D Price
Change %
WTBFB100%
+0.13%
TCBK - WTBFB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BANF - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
SFBS - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
STBA - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
EFSC - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
More