CEFC
Price
$10.65
Change
+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
NODB
Price
$54.50
Change
-$0.58 (-1.05%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
98.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEFC vs NODB

Header iconCEFC vs NODB Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs NODBBanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$10.65
Change+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Volume$6.46K
Capitalization25.88M
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$54.50
Change-$0.58 (-1.05%)
Volume$1.85K
Capitalization98.4M
CEFC vs NODB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. NODB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a StrongBuy and NODB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CEFC: $10.65 vs. NODB: $54.50)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and NODB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 739% vs. NODB: 409%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $25.88M vs. NODB: $98.4M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.88M. NODB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $98.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNODB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NODB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than NODB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NODB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CEFC and NODB are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while NODB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NODB($98.4M) has a higher market cap than CEFC($25.9M). NODB YTD gains are higher at: 21.332 vs. CEFC (11.080). NODB has less debt than CEFC: NODB (5.45M) vs CEFC (39.8M). NODB has higher revenues than CEFC: NODB (28.7M) vs CEFC (11.5M).
CEFCNODBCEFC / NODB
Capitalization25.9M98.4M26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.08021.33252%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue11.5M28.7M40%
Total Cash6.29MN/A-
Total Debt39.8M5.45M731%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC vs NODB: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
NODB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
670
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1412
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEFC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (57). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (100). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (70). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (52). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

NODB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CEFC (14). This means that NODB’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFCNODB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QASGX26.710.30
+1.14%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth A
NEFJX19.900.15
+0.76%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap A
VVOIX22.510.15
+0.67%
Invesco Value Opportunities Y
RSMVX10.880.04
+0.37%
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Value R6
PJEAX15.500.05
+0.32%
PGIM US Real Estate A

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and HFBL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and HFBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
+2.90%
HFBL - CEFC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
WTBFB - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More