CEFC
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.50 (+4.35%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
47.58M
NODB
Price
$57.75
Change
+$0.50 (+0.87%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
148.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEFC vs NODB

Header iconCEFC vs NODB Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs NODBBanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$12.00
Change+$0.50 (+4.35%)
Volume$504
Capitalization47.58M
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
Price$57.75
Change+$0.50 (+0.87%)
Volume$200
Capitalization148.36M
CEFC vs NODB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. NODB commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a Buy and NODB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CEFC: $12.00 vs. NODB: $57.75)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and NODB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 14% vs. NODB: 29%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $47.58M vs. NODB: $148.36M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.58M. NODB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $148.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNODB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NODB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than NODB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NODB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the short-term than NODB.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while NODB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NODB($148M) has a higher market cap than CEFC($47.6M). NODB has higher P/E ratio than CEFC: NODB (36.78) vs CEFC (8.11). NODB YTD gains are higher at: 28.803 vs. CEFC (25.160). NODB has more cash in the bank: 14.6M vs. CEFC (6.29M). NODB has less debt than CEFC: NODB (5.45M) vs CEFC (39.8M).
CEFCNODBCEFC / NODB
Capitalization47.6M148M32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.16028.80387%
P/E Ratio8.1136.7822%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash6.29M14.6M43%
Total Debt39.8M5.45M731%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC vs NODB: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
NODB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3688
SMR RATING
1..100
581
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEFC's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODB (88). This means that CEFC’s stock grew significantly faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODB (88). This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODB (81). This means that CEFC’s stock grew significantly faster than NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (52). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as NODB (11). This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to NODB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFCNODB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDSCX34.210.19
+0.56%
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend I
RYAVX79.020.35
+0.44%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value H
SDVRX26.64N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R
GCLSX25.27-0.03
-0.12%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
OPTFX92.03-0.22
-0.24%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap A

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and HFBL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and HFBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
+4.35%
HFBL - CEFC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
BAP - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
WTBFB - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

NODB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NODB and CWBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NODB and CWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODB
1D Price
Change %
NODB100%
N/A
CWBK - NODB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLBK - NODB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGKKF - NODB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCFB - NODB
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
CEFC - NODB
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.35%
More